Website reputation report

online.no

Last checked 4 hours ago · Point-in-time assessment

● Evidence is limited

What is this website?

online.no is currently classified in the Shipping and Logistics category based on observed public pages. Recurring page-metadata topics include telenor, her finner du, mobil.

No listed local patterns observedHomepage-only analysis is not a malware clearance. Read the scope and findings below.

77/100Safety Score
75%Evidence Confidence
Trust Radar evidence profile Eight evidence dimensions from zero to one hundred. Exact values surround the chart. Threat Intelligence55 Domain History95 Infrastructure95 Website Security95 Security Hygiene80 Transparency52 Reputation50 Operational Stability84
Trust RadarEight observed factors. Select one to inspect its evidence.

How to read this report

Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.

No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.

Independent evidence brief

What we observed about online.no

Updated Oct 1, 2026

The latest scan examined 0 public pages on online.no. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.

Purpose and visible content

On its homepage, the site says: Logg inn på din Online E-post. Her finner du også siste nytt, gode sikkerhetstips – og spennende innhold om mobil, bredbånd og underholdning.

Observed page title: Online – E-post og nettmagasin fra Telenor.

Registrar and domain history

Registered on Nov 14, 1999. Registrar: Telenor Norge AS.

Connection and hosting evidence

The checked homepage returned HTTP 200 in about 2000 ms.

A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Nov 13, 2026.

Threat checks and score context

External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.

Safety Score: 77/100. Evidence Confidence: 75%. These measure different things.

Public page evidence

Topics and keywords observed on online.no

12 phrases

These phrases were extracted locally from sampled public page metadata. They are observations, not search-volume or ranking estimates.

telenorTitle, H1, Meta description7 sampled pages
her finner duMeta description4 sampled pages
mobilTitle, Meta description4 sampled pages
telenor idTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
hjelpTitle, Meta description3 sampled pages
informasjonTitle, Meta description3 sampled pages
siste nyttTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
telenor norgeTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
postTitle, Meta description2 sampled pages
abonnementMeta description3 sampled pages
bredbåndMeta description3 sampled pages
mobilabonnementMeta description3 sampled pages

At a glance

Key findings

✓

Report is current

The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.

i

Confidence is separate

Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.

!

Verify before sensitive actions

Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.

Fully explainable

Why this score?

Versioned weights
Threat IntelligenceWeight 25%
55/100

Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.

Domain HistoryWeight 10%
95/100

Domain registration age and expiry were checked.

InfrastructureWeight 10%
95/100

Observed DNS records and network address were checked.

Website SecurityWeight 15%
95/100

Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.

Security HygieneWeight 15%
80/100

Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.

TransparencyWeight 5%
52/100

Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.

ReputationWeight 5%
50/100

Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.

Operational StabilityWeight 15%
84/100

Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.

Server-side analysis

Automated security checks

Local antivirus and phishing checks

ClamAV · homepage HTMLNo signature match in the sampled HTML
Engine version1.5.4
Signature database date (UTC)2026-10-01T06:24:38+00:00
HTML bytes submitted229,813
Phishing.Database · exact hostnameNot listed in this snapshot
Feed downloaded (UTC)2026-10-01T18:00:08+00:00
Hosts in local snapshot386,078

Sampled scripts and pages

Resource analysis incomplete

3 resources checked · 1 script links observed on the homepage. Partial resource coverage.

ClamAV inspects the fetched homepage HTML on our server. New scans also sample up to four linked scripts and two collected internal pages, with size and time limits. Scripts are not executed. Other downloads, private server files and logged-in pages remain outside this check. A signature match needs investigation and can be a false positive. No match is not a whole-site safety guarantee.

Exact hostname lookup uses a downloaded Phishing.Database snapshot. It does not send this domain to an external lookup API or mark sibling subdomains as harmful. Not listed does not mean safe. Snapshot age is download age, not proof that every entry was recently revalidated.

Homepage HTML only · Eight local rule families · local-security-v2

Checks use the fetched page and redirect chain. Scripts are not executed, forms are not submitted, and linked files are not downloaded. This is not a malware clearance.

Page resource inventory

Linked scripts1
Inline scripts2
Embedded frames0
External script hosts0

Counts describe the sampled HTML, not every resource loaded by the browser. External resources are common and are not automatically harmful.

No listed local patterns observed. The limited rule set cannot detect every threat or behavior.

External threat intelligence

Provider coverageNot checked

Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.

Registration

Domain information

Public RDAP observation
Canonical domainonline.no
RegistrarTelenor Norge AS
RegisteredNov 14, 1999
Domain age26 years
ExpiresUnavailable
Registry statusesUnavailable
Report statePublished

Infrastructure

Network & hosting

Observed endpoint, not legal location
IP address20.100.134.111
Autonomous systemUnavailable
Network organizationUnavailable
Observed countryUnavailable
CDNNot detected
Web application firewallNot detected

At a glance

Infrastructure summary

Observed during this scan

A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.

HTTP response200 · https://www.telenor.no/online/
Endpoint20.100.134.111
NetworkUnavailable
CDN and WAFNot detected · Not detected
DNS surface25 records · 2 nameservers · 4 mail exchangers
Protection signals8 security headers · 3 technologies · DNSSEC unknown

Page telemetry

Observed page statistics

Safe metadata only

These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.

Response size229,813 bytes
HTTP check duration2,000 ms
Cookies observedUnavailable
Script resources1 · 0 external hosts
Frames and sampled checks0 frames · 3 resources checked

Encrypted transport

TLS certificate

Valid when observed
StatusValid when observed
ProtocolTLSv1.3
IssuercountryName=US, organizationName=Let's Encrypt, commonName=YR2
Valid fromAug 15, 2026
Valid untilNov 13, 2026
Certificate namesonline.no · www.online.no

Resolution

DNS footprint

DNSKEY status unknown

DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.

A20.100.134.111TTL —
NSns1.nextra.noTTL —
NSns2.nextra.noTTL —
MX10 mx1c60.megamailservers.euTTL —
MX100 mx2c60.megamailservers.euTTL —
MX110 mx3c60.megamailservers.euTTL —
MX120 mx4c60.megamailservers.euTTL —
TXT_cmpcnuvvd86ux2sqqngmswtpbknpvzwTTL —
CAA0 iodef "mailto:hostmaster@telenor.net"TTL —
CAA0 issue "buypass.no"TTL —
CAA0 issue "digicert.com"TTL —
CAA0 issue "letsencrypt.org"TTL —
CAA0 issue "sectigo.com"TTL —
CAA0 issue "trust-provider.com"TTL —
CAA0 issue "usertrust.com"TTL —
CAA0 issuevmc "digicert.com"TTL —
CAA0 issuewild "buypass.no"TTL —
CAA0 issuewild "letsencrypt.org"TTL —
CAA0 issuewild "sectigo.com"TTL —
CAA0 issuewild "telenor.net"TTL —
CAA0 issuewild "trust-provider.com"TTL —
CAA0 issuewild "usertrust.com"TTL —
TXT804b32734bb6bd81242b72b4d6eb540ec09bb2629f0f284ab70bec20d812a09aTTL —
TXTfacebook-domain-verification=vfmkcv16aybcg1ojpsya8xtlwmgoj8TTL —
TXTv=spf1 include:spf.online.no include:spfc60.megamailservers.eu -allTTL —

DNS observations · no external lookup API

Domain email protection

Exact-host SPF and DMARC observations help the owner investigate email impersonation risks. They are separate from website malware checks and do not change the Safety Score.

SPFPolicy record observed, not fully validated
DMARCPolicy record observed, not fully validated

What to do next

Review the records with your mail administrator. Inventory legitimate senders and test SPF and DKIM alignment before enforcing a stricter DMARC policy. Fix duplicate records and investigate overly permissive SPF rules.

This bounded check does not send email, probe SMTP, evaluate recursive SPF includes, verify DKIM signatures or apply organizational-domain DMARC inheritance. A missing subdomain record does not prove that no inherited protection exists. A DNS timeout is unknown, not an absent record. A policy record is not proof that messages authenticate successfully.

Responsible disclosure

security.txt

RFC 9116 observation

No readable security.txt file was observed at the standard locations. This is informational and is not evidence of malware.

Browser protections

Security headers

8 observed
content-security-policypresent base-uri 'none'; font-src 'self' https: data:; form-action 'self' epost.online.no; frame-ancestors 'self' *.telenor.no telenor.no; img-src 'self' https: data:; object-src 'none'; style-src 'self' https: blob: 'unsafe-inline' telenor.no *.telenor.no; script-src 'self' telenor.no *.telenor.no https: 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval'; upgrade-insecure-requests; worker-src blob:;
cross-origin-opener-policypresent same-origin
cross-origin-resource-policypresent same-origin
permissions-policypresent camera=(), display-capture=(), fullscreen=(*), geolocation=(self), microphone=()
referrer-policypresent strict-origin-when-cross-origin
strict-transport-securitypresent max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-optionspresent nosniff
x-frame-optionspresent SAMEORIGIN

Response headers

Cookie protections

Passive observation

No Set-Cookie header was observed on the sampled homepage response. Other pages may set cookies separately.

Detected stack

Technologies

Bootstrap 80% Tailwind CSS 72% Vue.js 78%

Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.

JavaScript library advisories

1 sampled JavaScript files checked locally with Retire.js. Database snapshot: 2026-10-01T02:40:06.962Z.

No supported library version was identified in the sampled files. This does not establish that the scripts are safe.

A version match is not proof that the website is infected or that an issue is exploitable here. Owners should review the advisory, check whether their code is affected and test an update. Up to four external script files are sampled, not every dependency, inline script or dynamically loaded resource.

Recommended maintenance checks

Vue.jsKeep Vue and build dependencies current and review third-party packages included in the production bundle.

Structured facts

Website identity & response

Public page metadata
Page titleOnline – E-post og nettmagasin fra Telenor
First headingTelenor ID gir deg trygg innlogging
DescriptionLogg inn på din Online E-post. Her finner du også siste nytt, gode sikkerhetstips – og spennende innhold om mobil, bredbånd og underholdning.
Canonical URLhttps://www.telenor.no/online/
Final URLhttps://www.telenor.no/online/
HTTP response200 · text/html;charset=utf-8 · 2000 ms
Languageno
Structured typesBreadcrumbList · ListItem
Page page detectedhttps://www.telenor.no/privat/
missing100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
no100% evidence confidence
same-origin100% evidence confidence
same-origin100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors credentials with wildcard100% evidence confidence
25100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
4100% evidence confidence
unavailable100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.cname present100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions usb restricted100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions payment restricted100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions geolocation restricted100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts preload100% evidence confidence
31536000100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp wildcard sources100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp has default src100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence

Connection path

Redirect chain

3 recorded hops
Hop 1https://www.online.no/
Hop 2https://www.telenor.no/online
Hop 3https://www.telenor.no/online/

The chain is shown exactly as observed by the scanner. A redirect is not itself a malware finding, but unexpected domains or an HTTP downgrade deserve review.

Premium monitoring

Catch downtime and security changes automatically

Regular checks, availability history, and alert emails are reserved for Premium websites. Free reports remain point-in-time scans and do not create recurring server work.

Enable monitoring for this website

Compared with the previous scan

What changed

A comparison will appear after the next completed scan.

Explainable matching

Digital fingerprint

fingerprint-v1
clear-orbit-wave-281

Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.

DnsHashed private comparison value
TechnologiesHashed private comparison value

Material changes only

Change history

No meaningful changes recorded yet.

Website icon for online.no

Visual evidence

Website screenshot

Screenshot of online.no
Captured once in an isolated browser during this scan. Visual tint is an interface overlay. The original evidence is not duplicated.

For site owners

Show your verified trust report

Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.

Choose a badge style
Preview on your site
WebsiteVirusScanner trust badge preview

Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.

Questions about online.no

FAQ

Still have questions? Contact us →
Is online.no safe to visit?

The latest Safety Score is 77/100 with 75% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.

Did the scan detect malware on online.no?

ClamAV found no signature match in the sampled homepage HTML. External scripts, downloads and private server files were not checked. This is not a whole-site malware clearance.

When was online.no registered?

The public registry record shows Nov 14, 1999. Registration details may be privacy-protected or updated later.

Did online.no have a valid TLS certificate?

The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.3. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.

Can a paid listing change this website's score?

No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.