Website reputation report

commentlike.me

Last checked 1 month ago · Point-in-time assessment

64/100Technical Safety ScoreIndependent technical assessment, not a visitor rating
Would you recommend this page? No community votes yet 0/0 Your vote is for this page in this report only—not the entire website. No account required · One vote per browser.
Captured homepage of commentlike.me in the current scan
Website screenshot from the current report

Share report

● Evidence is limited

What is this website?

AI comments in your own voice on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), and Reddit. Trained on your writing samples, adapts to each platform's tone and subreddit culture.

No listed local patterns observedHomepage-only analysis is not a malware clearance. Read the scope and findings below.

64/100Safety Score
70%Evidence Confidence
Trust Radar evidence profile Eight evidence dimensions from zero to one hundred. Exact values surround the chart. Threat Intelligence55 Domain History0 Infrastructure88 Website Security95 Security Hygiene50 Transparency53 Reputation50 Operational Stability96
Trust RadarEight observed factors. Select one to inspect its evidence.

How to read this report

Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.

No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.

Current report context

What changed since the last scan

  • No earlier report to compare
What this scan could verify · 5 observed, 1 unavailable
DNS observed
Registration lookup unavailable Reason: stage unavailable
Network observed
TLS observed
Website response observed
Website content observed

Unavailable and unperformed checks are not clean results. The detailed evidence below remains the source for each conclusion.

Report an inaccuracy in this report →

Independent evidence brief

What we observed about commentlike.me

Updated Oct 11, 2026

The latest scan examined 10 public pages on commentlike.me. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.

Purpose and visible content

On its homepage, the site says: AI comments in your own voice on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), and Reddit. Trained on your writing samples, adapts to each platform's tone and subreddit…

Registrar and domain history

A reliable creation date was not returned by the registration lookup. The report leaves domain age unverified rather than guessing.

Connection and hosting evidence

The checked homepage returned HTTP 200.

A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Dec 13, 2026.

Threat checks and score context

External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.

Safety Score: 64/100. Evidence Confidence: 70%. These measure different things.

Community reviews of commentlike.me

No approved reviews yet ☆☆☆☆☆

Visitor experiences are separate from the independent technical Safety Score.

Visitor opinions remain separate from the technical Safety Score.

Public content profile

Pages reviewed on commentlike.me

10 of up to 10 pages

We sampled public pages from this website to understand its subject and contact paths. The titles and short descriptions below come from the website itself. They are not endorsements or independent safety findings.

CommentLikeMe | AI Comments in Your Voice for LinkedIn, X & RedditAI comments in your own voice on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), and Reddit. Trained on your writing samples, adapts to each platform's tone and subreddit culture. CommentLikeMe | AI Comments in Your Voice for LinkedIn, X & RedditAI comments in your own voice on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), and Reddit. Trained on your writing samples, adapts to each platform's tone and subreddit culture. Free LinkedIn Tools | CommentLikeMeFree tools for writing better LinkedIn posts. Preview your "see more" cutoff, format text with bold and italic. No signup, nothing leaves your browser. AI Tell Checker | Does Your Comment Sound AI-Written?Paste a comment and see the specific patterns that make it read as AI-written — canned phrases, AI vocabulary, emoji spray, "not X but Y". Free, runs in your browser. LinkedIn Post Preview | See Your "See More" CutoffFree LinkedIn post preview tool. See exactly where LinkedIn hides your post behind "…see more" on mobile and desktop, before you publish. No signup. LinkedIn Text Formatter | CommentLikeMeFree LinkedIn text formatter with bold, italic, bullets, and emoji. Format your posts for maximum engagement with live preview. Part of the CommentLikeMe toolkit. Timing is Everything: How the First 60 Minutes Impact LinkedIn Post Visibility | CommentLikeMe BlogTiming significantly affects LinkedIn post visibility by influencing the platform's algorithmic assessment during a critical initial window, often referred to a Why Most Creators Fail at LinkedIn Comment Engagement | CommentLikeMe BlogMost creators fail at LinkedIn comment engagement because they fundamentally misdiagnose the objective. They operate under the false assumption that the goal of The Impact of Comment Length on LinkedIn Engagement | CommentLikeMe BlogThe length of a LinkedIn comment directly impacts its engagement potential by influencing both algorithmic signals and human psychology. The optimal length is n Why Personalized Comments Outperform Generic Ones on LinkedIn | CommentLikeMe BlogPersonalized comments are more effective on LinkedIn because they satisfy both the platform's algorithmic priorities and fundamental human psychology. A persona

Public page evidence

Topics and keywords observed on commentlike.me

12 phrases

These phrases were extracted locally from sampled public page metadata. They are observations, not search-volume or ranking estimates.

linkedinTitle, H1, Meta description9 sampled pages
commentlikemeTitle, Meta description8 sampled pages
commentTitle, H1, Meta description4 sampled pages
on linkedinTitle, H1, Meta description4 sampled pages
linkedin postTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
commentsTitle, H1, Meta description3 sampled pages
engagementTitle, H1, Meta description3 sampled pages
commentlikeme blogTitle4 sampled pages
ai comments inTitle, Meta description2 sampled pages
freeTitle, H1, Meta description4 sampled pages
previewTitle, H1, Meta description3 sampled pages
linkedin commentTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages

At a glance

Key findings

✓

Report is current

The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.

i

Confidence is separate

Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.

!

Verify before sensitive actions

Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.

Fully explainable

Why this score?

Versioned weights
Threat IntelligenceWeight 25%
55/100

Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.

Domain HistoryWeight 10%
0/100

Evidence is unavailable.

InfrastructureWeight 10%
88/100

Observed DNS records and network address were checked.

Website SecurityWeight 15%
95/100

Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.

Security HygieneWeight 15%
50/100

Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.

TransparencyWeight 5%
53/100

Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.

ReputationWeight 5%
50/100

Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.

Operational StabilityWeight 15%
96/100

Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.

Server-side analysis

Automated security checks

Local antivirus and phishing checks

ClamAV · homepage HTMLNo signature match in the sampled HTML
Engine version1.5.4
Signature database date (UTC)2026-10-11T06:26:01+00:00
HTML bytes submitted62,305
Phishing.Database · exact hostnameNot listed in this snapshot
Feed downloaded (UTC)2026-10-11T12:00:11+00:00
Hosts in local snapshot386,082

Sampled scripts and pages

Resource analysis incomplete

6 resources checked · 15 script links observed on the homepage. Partial resource coverage.

ClamAV inspects the fetched homepage HTML on our server. New scans also sample up to four linked scripts and two collected internal pages, with size and time limits. Scripts are not executed. Other downloads, private server files and logged-in pages remain outside this check. A signature match needs investigation and can be a false positive. No match is not a whole-site safety guarantee.

Exact hostname lookup uses a downloaded Phishing.Database snapshot. It does not send this domain to an external lookup API or mark sibling subdomains as harmful. Not listed does not mean safe. Snapshot age is download age, not proof that every entry was recently revalidated.

Homepage HTML only · Eight local rule families · local-security-v2

Checks use the fetched page and redirect chain. Scripts are not executed, forms are not submitted, and linked files are not downloaded. This is not a malware clearance.

Page resource inventory

Linked scripts15
Inline scripts9
Embedded frames0
External script hosts0

Counts describe the sampled HTML, not every resource loaded by the browser. External resources are common and are not automatically harmful.

No listed local patterns observed. The limited rule set cannot detect every threat or behavior.

External threat intelligence

Provider coverageNot checked

Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.

Registration

Domain information

Public RDAP observation
Canonical domaincommentlike.me
RegistrarUnavailable
RegisteredUnavailable
Domain ageUnavailable
ExpiresUnavailable
Registry statusesUnavailable
Report statePublished

Infrastructure

Network & hosting

Observed endpoint, not legal location
IP address216.198.79.1
Autonomous systemUnavailable
Network organizationUnavailable
Observed countryUnavailable
CDNNot detected
Web application firewallNot detected

At a glance

Infrastructure summary

Observed during this scan

A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.

HTTP response200 · https://www.commentlike.me/
Endpoint216.198.79.1
NetworkUnavailable
CDN and WAFNot detected · Not detected
DNS surface8 records · 2 nameservers · 0 mail exchangers
Protection signals1 security headers · 3 technologies · DNSSEC unknown

Page telemetry

Observed page statistics

Safe metadata only

These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.

Response size62,305 bytes
HTTP check duration0 ms
Cookies observedUnavailable
Script resources15 · 0 external hosts
Frames and sampled checks0 frames · 6 resources checked

Encrypted transport

TLS certificate

Valid when observed
StatusValid when observed
ProtocolTLSv1.3
IssuercountryName=US, organizationName=Let's Encrypt, commonName=YR2
Valid fromSep 14, 2026
Valid untilDec 13, 2026
Certificate namescommentlike.me

Resolution

DNS footprint

DNSKEY status unknown

DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.

A216.198.79.1TTL —
A216.198.79.65TTL —
NSns1.vercel-dns.comTTL —
NSns2.vercel-dns.comTTL —
CAA0 issue "letsencrypt.org"TTL —
CAA0 issue "pki.goog"TTL —
CAA0 issue "sectigo.com"TTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=revWbpwWBXKAWuv945FmZcJ5ohjPSwuxDa3GNH2SqCkTTL —

DNS observations · no external lookup API

Domain email protection

Exact-host SPF and DMARC observations help the owner investigate email impersonation risks. They are separate from website malware checks and do not change the Safety Score.

SPFNo matching record returned for this exact hostname
DMARCNo matching record returned for this exact hostname

What to do next

Review the records with your mail administrator. Inventory legitimate senders and test SPF and DKIM alignment before enforcing a stricter DMARC policy. Fix duplicate records and investigate overly permissive SPF rules.

This bounded check does not send email, probe SMTP, evaluate recursive SPF includes, verify DKIM signatures or apply organizational-domain DMARC inheritance. A missing subdomain record does not prove that no inherited protection exists. A DNS timeout is unknown, not an absent record. A policy record is not proof that messages authenticate successfully.

Responsible disclosure

security.txt

RFC 9116 observation

No readable security.txt file was observed at the standard locations. This is informational and is not evidence of malware.

Browser protections

Security headers

1 observed
strict-transport-securitypresent max-age=63072000

Response headers

Cookie protections

Passive observation

No Set-Cookie header was observed on the sampled homepage response. Other pages may set cookies separately.

Detected stack

Technologies

Bootstrap 80% Next.js 96% Tailwind CSS 72%

Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.

JavaScript library advisories

4 sampled JavaScript files checked locally with Retire.js. Database snapshot: 2026-10-11T02:40:11.666Z.

react-dom 19.3.0-canary-52684925-20251110 No known advisories matched this version in the database snapshot.

A version match is not proof that the website is infected or that an issue is exploitable here. Owners should review the advisory, check whether their code is affected and test an update. Up to four external script files are sampled, not every dependency, inline script or dynamically loaded resource.

Recommended maintenance checks

Next.jsKeep Next.js and its runtime dependencies current, especially when server-side rendering is enabled.

Publisher supplied

Public contact details

These details were observed on the website, not independently verified as an active support channel.

Emailkalidandiirajesh@gmail.comSource: https://www.commentlike.me/support

Structured facts

Website identity & response

Public page metadata
Page titleCommentLikeMe | AI Comments in Your Voice for LinkedIn, X & Reddit
First headingComment like you.Everywhere.
DescriptionAI comments in your own voice on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), and Reddit. Trained on your writing samples, adapts to each platform's tone and subreddit culture.
Canonical URLhttps://www.commentlike.me
Final URLhttps://www.commentlike.me/
HTTP response200 · text/html; charset=utf-8 · duration unavailable
Languageen
Structured typesSoftwareApplication
Page page detectedhttps://www.commentlike.me/toolsSupport page detectedhttps://www.commentlike.me/support
missing100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
en100% evidence confidence
8100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.mail route count100% evidence confidence
unavailable100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.cname present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions policy present100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts preload100% evidence confidence
63072000100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts include subdomains100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp present100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors credentials with wildcard100% evidence confidence

Connection path

Redirect chain

1 recorded hops
Hop 1https://www.commentlike.me/

The chain is shown exactly as observed by the scanner. A redirect is not itself a malware finding, but unexpected domains or an HTTP downgrade deserve review.

Premium monitoring

Catch downtime and security changes automatically

Regular checks, availability history, and alert emails are reserved for Premium websites. Free reports remain point-in-time scans and do not create recurring server work.

Enable monitoring for this website

Compared with the previous scan

What changed

A comparison will appear after the next completed scan.

Explainable matching

Digital fingerprint

fingerprint-v1
steady-orbit-web-736

Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.

DnsHashed private comparison value
TechnologiesHashed private comparison value

Material changes only

Change history

Show change history

No meaningful changes recorded yet.

Website icon for commentlike.me

Visual evidence

Website screenshot

Screenshot of commentlike.me
Captured once in an isolated browser during this scan. Visual tint is an interface overlay. The original evidence is not duplicated.

For site owners

Show your verified trust report

Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.

Choose a badge style
Preview on your site
WebsiteVirusScanner trust badge preview

Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.

Questions about commentlike.me

FAQ

Still have questions? Contact us →
Is commentlike.me safe to visit?

The latest Safety Score is 64/100 with 70% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.

Did the scan detect malware on commentlike.me?

ClamAV found no signature match in the sampled homepage HTML. External scripts, downloads and private server files were not checked. This is not a whole-site malware clearance.

When was commentlike.me registered?

The registry lookup did not provide a reliable creation date in this scan.

Did commentlike.me have a valid TLS certificate?

The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.3. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.

Can a paid listing change this website's score?

No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.

Share your experience with commentlike.me

Community reviews are moderated and remain separate from the technical Safety Score.

Write review →