Website reputation report

which.co.uk

Last checked 2 days ago · Point-in-time assessment

● Evidence is limited

What is this website?

Public pages were observed on which.co.uk, but their subject was not confidently classified. An About page was also found. The sampled pages were marked as English-language. Recurring page-metadata topics include products, that, have.

No listed local patterns observedHomepage-only analysis is not a malware clearance. Read the scope and findings below.

77/100Safety Score
75%Evidence Confidence
Trust Radar evidence profile Eight evidence dimensions from zero to one hundred. Exact values surround the chart. Threat Intelligence55 Domain History95 Infrastructure92 Website Security95 Security Hygiene80 Transparency52 Reputation50 Operational Stability85
Trust RadarEight observed factors. Select one to inspect its evidence.

How to read this report

Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.

No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.

Independent evidence brief

What we observed about which.co.uk

Updated Sep 29, 2026

The latest scan examined 10 public pages on which.co.uk. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.

Purpose and visible content

On its About page, the site says: We’re here to make life simpler, fairer and safer for everyone

Registrar and domain history

Registered on Jul 1, 1995. Registrar: Gandi.

Recorded expiry date: Jul 1, 2027. Registry data can change.

Connection and hosting evidence

The checked homepage returned HTTP 200 in about 1000 ms.

A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Dec 29, 2026.

Threat checks and score context

External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.

Safety Score: 77/100. Evidence Confidence: 75%. These measure different things.

Public content profile

Pages reviewed on which.co.uk

10 of up to 10 pages

We sampled public pages from this website to understand its subject and contact paths. The titles and short descriptions below come from the website itself. They are not endorsements or independent safety findings.

Which? | Expert testing, reviews and advice - Which?Which? works for you reviewing products and services, so that you make the best purchase decisions for your needs. About us - Which?We’re here to make life simpler, fairer and safer for everyone Which? Free newsletters for everyone - Which?Get free advice from Which? – you don’t have to be a member to have these newsletters emailed to you regularly. 10 everyday products you didn't know have an expiry date - Which?From mascara to batteries, many everyday products don't last forever and have an expiration date. Find out when it's time to replace them – and what can happen if you don't. What will be the new hand luggage rules for Ryanair, Wizz and Easyjet in 2027? - Which?A new EU ruling means from 2027, airlines operating in the EU and UK must allow passengers to bring hand luggage, along with an underseat bag on board. Read more in our guide. Cheapest Michelin-starred restaurants in the UK starting at £20 for 2026 - Which?How to dine at cheaper Michelin star restaurants in the UK from London to York. Plus, what is the difference between Michelin guide, Bib Gourmand, and a Michelin star. Which? reveals: 10 pricey products that let down your wallet and expectations - Which?We've put thousands of things through our tests for this very reason: to help you avoid sinking hundreds of pounds into expensive but unimpressive products. Here's what to buy inst 10 big-name brands – and the surprising rivals that beat them in Which? tests - Which?Our product experts have uncovered Best Buys that outscore household-name rivals from Apple, Dyson, Le Creuset and more. Savings rates top over 5% – could they reach 6% again? - Which?Providers are hiking rates on savings accounts. Is it worth waiting for a better deal? How to transfer data to a new phone without a fuss - Which?Whether you're unboxing a new iPhone or Android phone, our tech experts will help you carry over the data that matters the most.

Public page evidence

Topics and keywords observed on which.co.uk

10 phrases

These phrases were extracted locally from sampled public page metadata. They are observations, not search-volume or ranking estimates.

productsTitle, H1, Meta description3 sampled pages
thatTitle, H1, Meta description4 sampled pages
haveTitle, H1, Meta description3 sampled pages
everyoneTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
testsTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
themTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
adviceTitle, Meta description2 sampled pages
overTitle, Meta description2 sampled pages
willTitle, Meta description2 sampled pages
theseH1, Meta description2 sampled pages

At a glance

Key findings

✓

Report is current

The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.

i

Confidence is separate

Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.

!

Verify before sensitive actions

Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.

Fully explainable

Why this score?

Versioned weights
Threat IntelligenceWeight 25%
55/100

Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.

Domain HistoryWeight 10%
95/100

Domain registration age and expiry were checked.

InfrastructureWeight 10%
92/100

Observed DNS records and network address were checked.

Website SecurityWeight 15%
95/100

Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.

Security HygieneWeight 15%
80/100

Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.

TransparencyWeight 5%
52/100

Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.

ReputationWeight 5%
50/100

Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.

Operational StabilityWeight 15%
85/100

Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.

Server-side analysis

Automated security checks

Local antivirus and phishing checks

ClamAV · homepage HTMLNo signature match in the sampled HTML
Engine version1.5.4
Signature database date (UTC)2026-09-29T06:26:15+00:00
HTML bytes submitted393,439
Phishing.Database · exact hostnameNot listed in this snapshot
Feed downloaded (UTC)2026-09-29T18:00:06+00:00
Hosts in local snapshot386,017

Sampled scripts and pages

Resource analysis incomplete

6 resources checked · 8 script links observed on the homepage. Partial resource coverage.

ClamAV inspects the fetched homepage HTML on our server. New scans also sample up to four linked scripts and two collected internal pages, with size and time limits. Scripts are not executed. Other downloads, private server files and logged-in pages remain outside this check. A signature match needs investigation and can be a false positive. No match is not a whole-site safety guarantee.

Exact hostname lookup uses a downloaded Phishing.Database snapshot. It does not send this domain to an external lookup API or mark sibling subdomains as harmful. Not listed does not mean safe. Snapshot age is download age, not proof that every entry was recently revalidated.

Homepage HTML only · Eight local rule families · local-security-v2

Checks use the fetched page and redirect chain. Scripts are not executed, forms are not submitted, and linked files are not downloaded. This is not a malware clearance.

Page resource inventory

Linked scripts8
Inline scripts15
Embedded frames0
External script hosts2

Counts describe the sampled HTML, not every resource loaded by the browser. External resources are common and are not automatically harmful.

No listed local patterns observed. The limited rule set cannot detect every threat or behavior.

External threat intelligence

Provider coverageNot checked

Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.

Registration

Domain information

Public RDAP observation
Canonical domainwhich.co.uk
RegistrarGandi
RegisteredJul 1, 1995
Domain age31 years
ExpiresJul 1, 2027
Registry statusesclient transfer prohibited
Report statePublished

Infrastructure

Network & hosting

Observed endpoint, not legal location
IP address34.248.189.184
Autonomous systemUnavailable
Network organizationUnavailable
Observed countryUnavailable
CDNAmazon CloudFront
Web application firewallNot detected

At a glance

Infrastructure summary

Observed during this scan

A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.

HTTP response200 · https://www.which.co.uk/
Endpoint34.248.189.184
NetworkUnavailable
CDN and WAFAmazon CloudFront · Not detected
DNS surface42 records · 4 nameservers · 2 mail exchangers
Protection signals4 security headers · 4 technologies · DNSSEC unknown

Page telemetry

Observed page statistics

Safe metadata only

These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.

Response size393,439 bytes
HTTP check duration1,000 ms
Cookies observed1
Script resources8 · 2 external hosts
Frames and sampled checks0 frames · 6 resources checked

Encrypted transport

TLS certificate

Valid when observed
StatusValid when observed
ProtocolTLSv1.3
IssuercountryName=US, organizationName=Amazon, commonName=Amazon RSA 2048 M04
Valid fromJun 15, 2026
Valid untilDec 29, 2026
Certificate names*.green.which.co.uk · *.internal.which.co.uk · *.which.co.uk · which.co.uk

Resolution

DNS footprint

DNSKEY status unknown

DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.

A34.248.189.184TTL —
A34.251.98.74TTL —
A54.229.92.201TTL —
NSns-1422.awsdns-49.orgTTL —
NSns-177.awsdns-22.comTTL —
NSns-1917.awsdns-47.co.ukTTL —
NSns-523.awsdns-01.netTTL —
MX10 eu-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.comTTL —
MX10 eu-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.comTTL —
TXT1password-site-verification=4AVETKVHHFEDZI7ITTVKAPV75ITTL —
TXTafqc7jgv7k45mreq6hskb4ocunTTL —
TXTapple-domain-verification=XhosNN1ptqHU9PN2TTL —
TXTaromgs6qiqg8pj1jb1pjrlauj4TTL —
TXTatlassian-domain-verification=DdM6v2tGCllZXbJSuV4hAe/4jUAMahcndL25R4LZJ1YzINQFODUOhCU70ZPAANZcTTL —
TXTfacebook-domain-verification=jjwb9bvbtvrb1vipjl1lu7usucc07eTTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=0MN6xZGSfGflkKqkEc3G5T5lUl1Z50bXZLDaHiiAd4UTTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=0QMXyo3nMSwR-94bFg7methDdzpba1PxCfgSFqaO0NoTTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=9NsDhFNYG6NSPWl9xA5N5GE0RZEFJaFVCqJLNO1tOR8TTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=b1ndmTHZStdI3domVKX9jjdcm9COWAGKJPFle2p5BDMTTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=b1Vnna2dUtcb78hB5u-7iXPNAR14y9SKNEe_R73dEJ0TTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=G9MNYtidgrmq1TPXYoUKYNKttYGGKJyhL34o4PdwIw4TTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=IbWLGHFw91hFPzwHFSOiMnd2ay_Z_7G9Gls8rVfJJHwTTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=JhkmHxCyu3JxJF-zkLKfjem03CWKSLxSfuzW8rd4KMITTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=jlQJbePfurATdOmjNF6qqjyHVjYeesmCyLDN5ONPGL0TTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=mCS7WZ9HUQX6GtHrOt7YSLkYNcLWwAcaTRrBW1X8zZATTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=mDwzQi_5rXbTs3I5zkNKTvIemetd3-Y_NsTr7F2BlK4TTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=NjDwc9B0UoJ2YU81mF16yB3dXNEKlry6tuwsPxGrwMETTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=nUrcjrJwrWA7dwLuAHKeRCtQl_T0f7X-YjWw8OlCcdETTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=QmlAZem8P65cRL3keNScMhasPkfrXQiMh2eIzy7XPUsTTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=sGgHBFIVTfky1xT0xuQVqTKbFejGutWlfVDvpkf3j8QTTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=VMg6Z1Nkesjiz8P8uxODS_dz2KEHOEbcyjjq5lsAsxETTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=YTCXquX-Ua7X6NEMEZnEuGy2tf5xk1w3EmdZqFJxpiYTTL —
TXTibmid=160e387d-4bf9-4b08-b21d-f99fb4d52040TTL —
TXTmiro-verification=b846e7e004e367a4cdd3846eb914b9d4eb039512TTL —
TXTMS=ms82245533TTL —
TXTonetrust-domain-verification=656e1cfaefcb4e5888663b08454a1af2TTL —
TXTprodpad-domain-verification=LJK8VD7RHWPXPkmtt11dJdWumw42XcTXwRC4v7i35mw=TTL —
TXTsegment-site-verification=llrtNcNx39akuOu1SgxKr8nPEPfyULiRTTL —
TXTstripe-verification=2aad228fb271e51dbbf3fd2e2f20635eb01f2eca84fc53b0eca39babac67ca0fTTL —
TXTv=spf1 ip4:94.236.83.186 ip4:31.221.13.100 ip4:80.6.91.150 ip4:20.90.195.58 ip4:51.143.240.107 include:_spf.google.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com include:amazonses.com include:eu._netblocks.mimecast.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~allTTL —
TXTv6l9d2r09ja6g77qutcq7ilsnTTL —
TXTyandex-verification=077673d84d6a3cc3TTL —

DNS observations · no external lookup API

Domain email protection

Exact-host SPF and DMARC observations help the owner investigate email impersonation risks. They are separate from website malware checks and do not change the Safety Score.

SPFDNS lookup unavailable
DMARCPolicy record observed, not fully validated

What to do next

Review the records with your mail administrator. Inventory legitimate senders and test SPF and DKIM alignment before enforcing a stricter DMARC policy. Fix duplicate records and investigate overly permissive SPF rules.

This bounded check does not send email, probe SMTP, evaluate recursive SPF includes, verify DKIM signatures or apply organizational-domain DMARC inheritance. A missing subdomain record does not prove that no inherited protection exists. A DNS timeout is unknown, not an absent record. A policy record is not proof that messages authenticate successfully.

Responsible disclosure

security.txt

RFC 9116 observation
StatusPublished and readable
Security contacts1
Policy linkNot observed
ExpiryValid when observed

This is a public vulnerability-reporting contact file. Its presence does not prove that the website is safe and does not change the independent Safety Score.

Browser protections

Security headers

4 observed
referrer-policypresent no-referrer
strict-transport-securitypresent max-age=31536000
x-content-type-optionspresent nosniff
x-frame-optionspresent SAMEORIGIN

Response headers

Cookie protections

Passive observation
Cookies observed1
Missing Secure0
Missing HttpOnly1
Missing SameSite1

Only cookie attribute counts are retained. Cookie names and values are never stored. These observations are not proof of compromise and do not independently change the Safety Score.

Detected stack

Technologies

Apache HTTP Server 93% Bootstrap 80% Google Tag Manager 96% Tailwind CSS 72%

Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.

JavaScript library advisories

4 sampled JavaScript files checked locally with Retire.js. Database snapshot: 2026-09-29T02:40:05.559Z.

react-dom 18.2.0 No known advisories matched this version in the database snapshot.

A version match is not proof that the website is infected or that an issue is exploitable here. Owners should review the advisory, check whether their code is affected and test an update. Up to four external script files are sampled, not every dependency, inline script or dynamically loaded resource.

Recommended maintenance checks

Apache HTTP ServerReview the Apache branch and keep security patches current. Avoid exposing detailed server version headers.

About this website

What the site says about itself

We’re here to make life simpler, fairer and safer for everyone

View the site's About page ↗

This is publisher supplied information. The independent safety findings are shown separately.

Publisher supplied

Public contact details

These details were observed on the website, not independently verified as an active support channel.

Structured facts

Website identity & response

Public page metadata
Page titleWhich? | Expert testing, reviews and advice - Which?
First headingUnavailable
DescriptionWhich? works for you reviewing products and services, so that you make the best purchase decisions for your needs.
Canonical URLhttps://www.which.co.uk
Final URLhttps://www.which.co.uk/
HTTP response200 · text/html; charset=utf-8 · 1000 ms
Languageen
Structured typesItemList · SiteNavigationElement · WebPage · WebSite
Page page detectedhttps://www.which.co.uk/news/article/surprising-everyday-products-that-have-an-expiry-date-a0fxX2E6MpgiAbout page detectedhttps://www.which.co.uk/about-which/sitemap
present100% evidence confidence
Security txt.has policy100% evidence confidence
Security txt.has canonical100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
en100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
42100% evidence confidence
4100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
unavailable100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.cname present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions policy present100% evidence confidence
3100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts preload100% evidence confidence
31536000100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts include subdomains100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors wildcard origin100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors credentials with wildcard100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local cookies.cookies missing secure100% evidence confidence

Connection path

Redirect chain

1 recorded hops
Hop 1https://www.which.co.uk/

The chain is shown exactly as observed by the scanner. A redirect is not itself a malware finding, but unexpected domains or an HTTP downgrade deserve review.

Premium monitoring

Catch downtime and security changes automatically

Regular checks, availability history, and alert emails are reserved for Premium websites. Free reports remain point-in-time scans and do not create recurring server work.

Enable monitoring for this website

Compared with the previous scan

What changed

A comparison will appear after the next completed scan.

Explainable matching

Digital fingerprint

fingerprint-v1
steady-orbit-ring-718

Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.

DnsHashed private comparison value
TechnologiesHashed private comparison value

Material changes only

Change history

No meaningful changes recorded yet.

Website icon for which.co.uk

Visual evidence

Website screenshot

Screenshot of which.co.uk
Captured once in an isolated browser during this scan. Visual tint is an interface overlay. The original evidence is not duplicated.

For site owners

Show your verified trust report

Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.

Choose a badge style
Preview on your site
WebsiteVirusScanner trust badge preview

Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.

Questions about which.co.uk

FAQ

Still have questions? Contact us →
Is which.co.uk safe to visit?

The latest Safety Score is 77/100 with 75% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.

Did the scan detect malware on which.co.uk?

ClamAV found no signature match in the sampled homepage HTML. External scripts, downloads and private server files were not checked. This is not a whole-site malware clearance.

When was which.co.uk registered?

The public registry record shows Jul 1, 1995. Registration details may be privacy-protected or updated later.

Did which.co.uk have a valid TLS certificate?

The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.3. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.

How does which.co.uk describe itself?

The website's About page describes its purpose in the report above. This is publisher-supplied information and is separate from independent security findings.

Can a paid listing change this website's score?

No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.