The latest scan examined 0 public pages on webmproject.org. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.
Purpose and visible content
Observed page signals place this website in Other Websites. A fuller description was not available from its public pages during this scan.
Observed page title: Google.
Registrar and domain history
Registered on Apr 28, 2010. Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc..
Recorded expiry date: Apr 28, 2027. Registry data can change.
Connection and hosting evidence
The checked homepage returned HTTP 200 in about 1000 ms.
A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Dec 11, 2026.
Threat checks and score context
External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.
Safety Score: 71/100. Evidence Confidence: 70%. These measure different things.
Community reviews of webmproject.org
No approved reviews yet☆☆☆☆☆
Visitor experiences are separate from the independent technical Safety Score.
Visitor opinions remain separate from the technical Safety Score.
The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.
i
Confidence is separate
Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.
!
Verify before sensitive actions
Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.
Fully explainable
Why this score?
Versioned weights
Threat IntelligenceWeight 25%
55/100
Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.
Domain HistoryWeight 10%
93/100
Domain registration age and expiry were checked.
InfrastructureWeight 10%
95/100
Observed DNS records and network address were checked.
Website SecurityWeight 15%
95/100
Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.
Security HygieneWeight 15%
45/100
Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.
TransparencyWeight 5%
37/100
Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.
ReputationWeight 5%
50/100
Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.
Operational StabilityWeight 15%
85/100
Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.
Server-side analysis
Automated security checks
Local antivirus and phishing checks
ClamAV · homepage HTMLLocal antivirus is not enabled
0 resources checked · 0 script links observed on the homepage.
ClamAV inspects the fetched homepage HTML on our server. New scans also sample up to four linked scripts and two collected internal pages, with size and time limits. Scripts are not executed. Other downloads, private server files and logged-in pages remain outside this check. A signature match needs investigation and can be a false positive. No match is not a whole-site safety guarantee.
Exact hostname lookup uses a downloaded Phishing.Database snapshot. It does not send this domain to an external lookup API or mark sibling subdomains as harmful. Not listed does not mean safe. Snapshot age is download age, not proof that every entry was recently revalidated.
Homepage HTML only · Eight local rule families · local-security-v2
Checks use the fetched page and redirect chain. Scripts are not executed, forms are not submitted, and linked files are not downloaded. This is not a malware clearance.
Page resource inventory
Linked scripts0
Inline scripts10
Embedded frames0
External script hosts0
Counts describe the sampled HTML, not every resource loaded by the browser. External resources are common and are not automatically harmful.
No listed local patterns observed. The limited rule set cannot detect every threat or behavior.
External threat intelligence
Provider coverageNot checked
Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.
A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.
HTTP response200 · https://www.google.com/
Endpoint192.178.24.68
NetworkUnavailable
CDN and WAFNot detected · Not detected
DNS surface16 records · 4 nameservers · 7 mail exchangers
These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.
Response size85,080 bytes
HTTP check duration1,000 ms
Cookies observed3
Script resources0 · 0 external hosts
Frames and sampled checks0 frames · 0 resources checked
Exact-host SPF and DMARC observations help the owner investigate email impersonation risks. They are separate from website malware checks and do not change the Safety Score.
SPFPolicy record observed, not fully validated
DMARCPolicy record observed, not fully validated
What to do next
Review the records with your mail administrator. Inventory legitimate senders and test SPF and DKIM alignment before enforcing a stricter DMARC policy. Fix duplicate records and investigate overly permissive SPF rules.
This bounded check does not send email, probe SMTP, evaluate recursive SPF includes, verify DKIM signatures or apply organizational-domain DMARC inheritance. A missing subdomain record does not prove that no inherited protection exists. A DNS timeout is unknown, not an absent record. A policy record is not proof that messages authenticate successfully.
Responsible disclosure
security.txt
RFC 9116 observation
StatusPublished and readable
Security contacts2
Policy linkObserved
ExpiryMissing or expired
This is a public vulnerability-reporting contact file. Its presence does not prove that the website is safe and does not change the independent Safety Score.
Browser protections
Security headers
1 observed
x-frame-optionspresent SAMEORIGIN
Response headers
Cookie protections
Passive observation
Cookies observed3
Missing Secure1
Missing HttpOnly1
Missing SameSite1
Only cookie attribute counts are retained. Cookie names and values are never stored. These observations are not proof of compromise and do not independently change the Safety Score.
Detected stack
Technologies
Not confidently detected
Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.
JavaScript library advisories
JavaScript advisory analysis could not be completed or no eligible script files were sampled. No clean result is implied.
Structured facts
Website identity & response
Public page metadata
Page titleGoogle
First headingUnavailable
DescriptionUnavailable
Canonical URLhttps://www.google.com/
Final URLhttps://www.google.com/
HTTP response200 · text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 · 1000 ms
Dns consistency.cname present100% evidence confidence
unavailable100% evidence confidence
7100% evidence confidence
4100% evidence confidence
16100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
3100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors credentials with wildcard100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors wildcard origin100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions policy present100% evidence confidence
Connection path
Redirect chain
1 recorded hops
Hop 1https://www.google.com/
The chain is shown exactly as observed by the scanner. A redirect is not itself a malware finding, but unexpected domains or an HTTP downgrade deserve review.
Premium monitoring
Catch downtime and security changes automatically
Regular checks, availability history, and alert emails are reserved for Premium websites. Free reports remain point-in-time scans and do not create recurring server work.
A comparison will appear after the next completed scan.
Explainable matching
Digital fingerprint
fingerprint-v1
⌘
deep-beacon-mesh-014
Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.
DnsHashed private comparison value
TechnologiesHashed private comparison value
Explore the same space
Sites related to webmproject.org
Based on published evidence
These independent reports share an observed category or website topic with webmproject.org. A match is a way to explore similar websites, not proof of common ownership or equal safety.
No other published report currently shares a sufficiently confident category or topic. This section updates as the catalog grows.
Material changes only
Change history
Show change history
No meaningful changes recorded yet.
Visual evidence
Website screenshot
webmproject.orgPreview unavailable
The capture service was temporarily unavailable. This is not a finding about the website. You can request another scan.
For site owners
Show your verified trust report
Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.
Choose a badge style
Preview on your site
Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.
The latest Safety Score is 71/100 with 70% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.
✳Did the scan detect malware on webmproject.org?⌄
External threat-provider coverage was unavailable for this scan, so malware status is unverified.
◷When was webmproject.org registered?⌄
The public registry record shows Apr 28, 2010. Registration details may be privacy-protected or updated later.
◇Did webmproject.org have a valid TLS certificate?⌄
The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.3. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.
?Can a paid listing change this website's score?⌄
No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.
Share your experience with webmproject.org
Community reviews are moderated and remain separate from the technical Safety Score.
