Website reputation report

technologyreview.kr

Last checked 7 hours ago · Point-in-time assessment

● Evidence is limited

What is this website?

MIT 테크놀로지 리뷰와 함께 가장 앞선 기술 변화의 흐름을 느껴보세요. AI, 빅데이터, 우주 과학, 바이오, 블록체인등 가장 앞서가는 기술 콘텐츠를 매일 구독하실 수 있습니다.

No listed local patterns observedHomepage-only analysis is not a malware clearance. Read the scope and findings below.

58/100Safety Score
70%Evidence Confidence
Trust Radar evidence profile Eight evidence dimensions from zero to one hundred. Exact values surround the chart. Threat Intelligence55 Domain History0 Infrastructure87 Website Security84 Security Hygiene35 Transparency49 Reputation50 Operational Stability83
Trust RadarEight observed factors. Select one to inspect its evidence.

How to read this report

Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.

No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.

Independent evidence brief

What we observed about technologyreview.kr

Updated Oct 3, 2026

The latest scan examined 6 public pages on technologyreview.kr. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.

Purpose and visible content

On its homepage, the site says: MIT 테크놀로지 리뷰와 함께 가장 앞선 기술 변화의 흐름을 느껴보세요. AI, 빅데이터, 우주 과학, 바이오, 블록체인등 가장 앞서가는 기술 콘텐츠를 매일 구독하실 수 있습니다.

Registrar and domain history

A reliable creation date was not returned by the registration lookup. The report leaves domain age unverified rather than guessing.

Connection and hosting evidence

The checked homepage returned HTTP 200 in about 3000 ms.

A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Mar 19, 2027.

Threat checks and score context

External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.

Safety Score: 58/100. Evidence Confidence: 70%. These measure different things.

Public content profile

Pages reviewed on technologyreview.kr

6 of up to 10 pages

We sampled public pages from this website to understand its subject and contact paths. The titles and short descriptions below come from the website itself. They are not endorsements or independent safety findings.

MIT Technology Review, MIT 테크놀로지 리뷰MIT 테크놀로지 리뷰와 함께 가장 앞선 기술 변화의 흐름을 느껴보세요. AI, 빅데이터, 우주 과학, 바이오, 블록체인등 가장 앞서가는 기술 콘텐츠를 매일 구독하실 수 있습니다. MIT 테크놀로지 리뷰 | MIT Technology Review Korea - 스페셜 리포트MIT 테크놀로지 리뷰가 제공하는 스페셜 리포트를 만나 보세요. 테크 분야의 최신 이슈를 깊이 있게 전합니다. 글로벌 기업과 기관들도 MIT 테크놀로지 리뷰와 함께 하여 깊이와 현장감을 더합니다. MIT 테크놀로지 리뷰 | MIT Technology Review Korea - 스페셜 리포트https://www.technologyreview.kr/reports/ AI 에이전트 해킹 잇따르는데…책임 물을 제도는 '공백' - MIT 테크놀로지 리뷰 | MIT Technology Review Koreahttps://www.technologyreview.kr/ai-%ec%97%90%ec%9d%b4%ec%a0%84%ed%8a%b8-%ed%95%b4%ed%82%b9-%ec%9e%87%eb%94%b0%eb%a5%b4%eb%8a%94%eb%8d%b0%ec%b1%85%ec%9e%84-%eb%ac%bc%ec%9d%84-%ec%a0%9c%eb%8f%84%eb%8a%94-%ea%b3%b5%eb%b0%b1/ 앤트로픽의 AI 과학적 발견 논란… '패턴 발견'과 '진짜 발견' 사이 - MIT 테크놀로지 리뷰 | MIT Technology Review Koreahttps://www.technologyreview.kr/%ec%95%a4%ed%8a%b8%eb%a1%9c%ed%94%bd%ec%9d%98-ai-%ea%b3%bc%ed%95%99%ec%a0%81-%eb%b0%9c%ea%b2%ac-%eb%85%bc%eb%9e%80%ed%8c%a8%ed%84%b4-%eb%b0%9c%ea%b2%ac%ea%b3%bc-%ec%a7%84%ec%a7%9c/ 이루기 힘든 '영생'의 꿈…젊은 장기 이식해도 회춘 효과 없었다 - MIT 테크놀로지 리뷰 | MIT Technology Review Koreahttps://www.technologyreview.kr/%ec%a0%8a%ec%9d%80-%ec%9e%a5%ea%b8%b0-%ec%9d%b4%ec%8b%9d%eb%b0%9b%ec%9d%80-%ec%82%ac%eb%9e%8c%ea%b9%8c%ec%a7%80-%ec%a0%8a%ea%b2%8c-%eb%a7%8c%eb%93%a4%ec%a7%80%eb%8a%94-%eb%aa%bb%ed%95%a0-%ec%88%98/

Public page evidence

Topics and keywords observed on technologyreview.kr

4 phrases

These phrases were extracted locally from sampled public page metadata. They are observations, not search-volume or ranking estimates.

technology reviewTitle6 sampled pages
테크놀로지 리뷰Title6 sampled pages
review koreaTitle5 sampled pages
스페셜 리포트Title, H12 sampled pages

At a glance

Key findings

✓

Report is current

The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.

i

Confidence is separate

Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.

!

Verify before sensitive actions

Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.

Fully explainable

Why this score?

Versioned weights
Threat IntelligenceWeight 25%
55/100

Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.

Domain HistoryWeight 10%
0/100

Evidence is unavailable.

InfrastructureWeight 10%
87/100

Observed DNS records and network address were checked.

Website SecurityWeight 15%
84/100

Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.

Security HygieneWeight 15%
35/100

Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.

TransparencyWeight 5%
49/100

Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.

ReputationWeight 5%
50/100

Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.

Operational StabilityWeight 15%
83/100

Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.

Server-side analysis

Automated security checks

Local antivirus and phishing checks

ClamAV · homepage HTMLLocal antivirus is not enabled
Phishing.Database · exact hostnameLocal feed snapshot unavailable

Sampled scripts and pages

Resource antivirus is not enabled

0 resources checked · 22 script links observed on the homepage. Partial resource coverage.

ClamAV inspects the fetched homepage HTML on our server. New scans also sample up to four linked scripts and two collected internal pages, with size and time limits. Scripts are not executed. Other downloads, private server files and logged-in pages remain outside this check. A signature match needs investigation and can be a false positive. No match is not a whole-site safety guarantee.

Exact hostname lookup uses a downloaded Phishing.Database snapshot. It does not send this domain to an external lookup API or mark sibling subdomains as harmful. Not listed does not mean safe. Snapshot age is download age, not proof that every entry was recently revalidated.

Homepage HTML only · Eight local rule families · local-security-v2

Checks use the fetched page and redirect chain. Scripts are not executed, forms are not submitted, and linked files are not downloaded. This is not a malware clearance.

Page resource inventory

Linked scripts22
Inline scripts24
Embedded frames1
External script hosts8

Counts describe the sampled HTML, not every resource loaded by the browser. External resources are common and are not automatically harmful.

No listed local patterns observed. The limited rule set cannot detect every threat or behavior.

External threat intelligence

Provider coverageNot checked

Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.

Registration

Domain information

Public RDAP observation
Canonical domaintechnologyreview.kr
RegistrarUnavailable
RegisteredUnavailable
Domain ageUnavailable
ExpiresUnavailable
Registry statusesUnavailable
Report statePublished

Infrastructure

Network & hosting

Observed endpoint, not legal location
IP address1.234.82.201
Autonomous systemUnavailable
Network organizationUnavailable
Observed countryUnavailable
CDNNot detected
Web application firewallNot detected

At a glance

Infrastructure summary

Observed during this scan

A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.

HTTP response200 · https://www.technologyreview.kr/
Endpoint1.234.82.201
NetworkUnavailable
CDN and WAFNot detected · Not detected
DNS surface7 records · 3 nameservers · 2 mail exchangers
Protection signals0 security headers · 4 technologies · DNSSEC unknown

Page telemetry

Observed page statistics

Safe metadata only

These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.

Response size167,253 bytes
HTTP check duration3,000 ms
Cookies observedUnavailable
Script resources22 · 8 external hosts
Frames and sampled checks1 frames · 0 resources checked

Encrypted transport

TLS certificate

Valid when observed
StatusValid when observed
ProtocolTLSv1.2
IssuercountryName=GB, organizationName=Sectigo Limited, commonName=Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36
Valid fromSep 2, 2026
Valid untilMar 19, 2027
Certificate namestechnologyreview.kr · www.technologyreview.kr

Resolution

DNS footprint

DNSKEY status unknown

DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.

A1.234.82.201TTL —
NSns.gabia.co.krTTL —
NSns.gabia.netTTL —
NSns1.gabia.co.krTTL —
MX10 kr1-aspmx1.worksmobile.comTTL —
MX20 kr1-aspmx2.worksmobile.comTTL —
TXTv=spf1 ip4:1.234.82.201 include:mail.stibee.com include:spf.worksmobile.com ~allTTL —

DNS observations · no external lookup API

Domain email protection

Exact-host SPF and DMARC observations help the owner investigate email impersonation risks. They are separate from website malware checks and do not change the Safety Score.

SPFPolicy record observed, not fully validated
DMARCMonitoring-only DMARC policy

What to do next

Review the records with your mail administrator. Inventory legitimate senders and test SPF and DKIM alignment before enforcing a stricter DMARC policy. Fix duplicate records and investigate overly permissive SPF rules.

This bounded check does not send email, probe SMTP, evaluate recursive SPF includes, verify DKIM signatures or apply organizational-domain DMARC inheritance. A missing subdomain record does not prove that no inherited protection exists. A DNS timeout is unknown, not an absent record. A policy record is not proof that messages authenticate successfully.

Responsible disclosure

security.txt

RFC 9116 observation

No readable security.txt file was observed at the standard locations. This is informational and is not evidence of malware.

Browser protections

Security headers

0 observed

Header evidence is unavailable. Missing data is not treated as a clean result or proof of compromise.

Response headers

Cookie protections

Passive observation

No Set-Cookie header was observed on the sampled homepage response. Other pages may set cookies separately.

Detected stack

Technologies

Bootstrap 80% Nginx 93% WooCommerce 90% WordPress 95%

Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.

JavaScript library advisories

JavaScript advisory analysis could not be completed or no eligible script files were sampled. No clean result is implied.

Recommended maintenance checks

NginxReview the Nginx branch and keep security patches current. Avoid exposing detailed server version headers.
WordPressKeep WordPress core, themes and plugins updated. Remove unused plugins and review administrator accounts.

Publisher supplied

Public contact details

These details were observed on the website, not independently verified as an active support channel.

Emailcustomer@technologyreview.krSource: https://www.technologyreview.kr/

Structured facts

Website identity & response

Public page metadata
Page titleMIT Technology Review, MIT 테크놀로지 리뷰
First heading개인정보 수집 및 이용
DescriptionMIT 테크놀로지 리뷰와 함께 가장 앞선 기술 변화의 흐름을 느껴보세요. AI, 빅데이터, 우주 과학, 바이오, 블록체인등 가장 앞서가는 기술 콘텐츠를 매일 구독하실 수 있습니다.
Canonical URLhttps://www.technologyreview.kr/
Final URLhttps://www.technologyreview.kr/
HTTP response200 · text/html; charset=UTF-8 · 3000 ms
Languageko
Structured typesOrganization · WebPage · WebSite
Page page detectedhttps://www.technologyreview.kr/special-report/
ko100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
missing100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors credentials with wildcard100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.cname present100% evidence confidence
unavailable100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
3100% evidence confidence
7100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors wildcard origin100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions policy present100% evidence confidence

Connection path

Redirect chain

1 recorded hops
Hop 1https://www.technologyreview.kr/

The chain is shown exactly as observed by the scanner. A redirect is not itself a malware finding, but unexpected domains or an HTTP downgrade deserve review.

Premium monitoring

Catch downtime and security changes automatically

Regular checks, availability history, and alert emails are reserved for Premium websites. Free reports remain point-in-time scans and do not create recurring server work.

Enable monitoring for this website

Compared with the previous scan

What changed

A comparison will appear after the next completed scan.

Explainable matching

Digital fingerprint

fingerprint-v1
quiet-vector-arc-280

Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.

DnsHashed private comparison value
TechnologiesHashed private comparison value

Material changes only

Change history

No meaningful changes recorded yet.

Website icon for technologyreview.kr

Visual evidence

Website screenshot

Screenshot of technologyreview.kr
Captured once in an isolated browser during this scan. Visual tint is an interface overlay. The original evidence is not duplicated.

For site owners

Show your verified trust report

Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.

Choose a badge style
Preview on your site
WebsiteVirusScanner trust badge preview

Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.

Questions about technologyreview.kr

FAQ

Still have questions? Contact us →
Is technologyreview.kr safe to visit?

The latest Safety Score is 58/100 with 70% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.

Did the scan detect malware on technologyreview.kr?

External threat-provider coverage was unavailable for this scan, so malware status is unverified.

When was technologyreview.kr registered?

The registry lookup did not provide a reliable creation date in this scan.

Did technologyreview.kr have a valid TLS certificate?

The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.2. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.

Can a paid listing change this website's score?

No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.