Website reputation report

technologyreview.jp

Last checked 12 hours ago · Point-in-time assessment

● Evidence is limited

What is this website?

Public pages were observed on technologyreview.jp, but their subject was not confidently classified. An About page was also found. The sampled pages were marked as Japanese-language. Recurring page-metadata topics include mitテクノロジーレビュー, tech review.

No listed local patterns observedHomepage-only analysis is not a malware clearance. Read the scope and findings below.

61/100Safety Score
70%Evidence Confidence
Trust Radar evidence profile Eight evidence dimensions from zero to one hundred. Exact values surround the chart. Threat Intelligence55 Domain History0 Infrastructure92 Website Security95 Security Hygiene45 Transparency43 Reputation50 Operational Stability84
Trust RadarEight observed factors. Select one to inspect its evidence.

How to read this report

Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.

No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.

Independent evidence brief

What we observed about technologyreview.jp

Updated Oct 1, 2026

The latest scan examined 10 public pages on technologyreview.jp. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.

Purpose and visible content

On its About page, the site says: オープンAI財団が、AIの学習用に「高品質な科学データセット」を作る新たな取り組みを始めた。助成先の一つは、経営破綻したバイオテクノロジー企業の破産手続きで、規制当局への申請資料など通常は営業秘密にあたる文書を買い取る構想だ。生物学データの不足が医療AIの最大のボトルネックになっているとの認識が背景にある。

Registrar and domain history

A reliable creation date was not returned by the registration lookup. The report leaves domain age unverified rather than guessing.

Connection and hosting evidence

The checked homepage returned HTTP 200 in about 2000 ms.

A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Apr 7, 2027.

Threat checks and score context

External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.

Safety Score: 61/100. Evidence Confidence: 70%. These measure different things.

Public content profile

Pages reviewed on technologyreview.jp

10 of up to 10 pages

We sampled public pages from this website to understand its subject and contact paths. The titles and short descriptions below come from the website itself. They are not endorsements or independent safety findings.

MITテクノロジーレビュー | テクノロジーが形作る世界を理解するテクノロジーが形作る世界を理解する MIT Tech Review: 破綻バイオ企業もターゲット、オープンAI財団が生物学データに助成オープンAI財団が、AIの学習用に「高品質な科学データセット」を作る新たな取り組みを始めた。助成先の一つは、経営破綻したバイオテクノロジー企業の破産手続きで、規制当局への申請資料など通常は営業秘密にあたる文書を買い取る構想だ。生物学データの不足が医療AIの最大のボトルネックになっているとの認識が背景にある。 MIT Tech Review: 1万のAIエージェントがミレニアム懸賞問題を解決、 人間の数学者に残る役割は?2人の数学者が公開モデルと1年かけて進めた研究は、完全な解には届かなかった。オープンAIは社内モデルと約1万のAIエージェントを投じ、数日で解いた。かかった費用は数百万ドル。数学の最難問が、潤沢な資金と専用モデルを持つ企業の領域になりつつある。 MIT Tech Review: 5万基の鏡で日照を延ばす、新興企業の野心的な計画に天文学者たちが反発米新興企業リフレクト・オービタルは、軌道上に最大5万基の鏡を並べ、必要なときに地球へ太陽光を反射する計画を進めている。太陽光パネルの充電や災害対応に役立つという。だが新たな研究によれば、その光は狙った地域をはるかに超えて夜空を明るくすることが分かり、天文学者は強く反発している。 MIT Tech Review: 世界のリーダーたちが集うダボス会議で持ちきりだった2つのことスイス・ダボスで開催中の世界経済フォーラムに、MITテクノロジーレビュー編集長のマット・ホーナンが参加している。ステージではAIが脚光を浴び、廊下ではトランプが話題を席巻する。誰もが語りたがる2つのテーマが支配する会場から、48時間の現地レポートをお届けする。 特定商取引法に基づく表示 | MITテクノロジーレビューhttps://www.technologyreview.jp/about/terms-of-sale/ ブランド | MITテクノロジーレビューhttps://www.technologyreview.jp/about/ 記事の使用許諾 | MITテクノロジーレビューhttps://www.technologyreview.jp/about/permissions/ 倫理規程 | MITテクノロジーレビューhttps://www.technologyreview.jp/about/ethics-statement/ 利用規約 | MITテクノロジーレビューhttps://www.technologyreview.jp/about/terms-of-service/

Public page evidence

Topics and keywords observed on technologyreview.jp

2 phrases

These phrases were extracted locally from sampled public page metadata. They are observations, not search-volume or ranking estimates.

mitテクノロジーレビューTitle6 sampled pages
tech reviewTitle4 sampled pages

At a glance

Key findings

✓

Report is current

The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.

i

Confidence is separate

Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.

!

Verify before sensitive actions

Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.

Fully explainable

Why this score?

Versioned weights
Threat IntelligenceWeight 25%
55/100

Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.

Domain HistoryWeight 10%
0/100

Evidence is unavailable.

InfrastructureWeight 10%
92/100

Observed DNS records and network address were checked.

Website SecurityWeight 15%
95/100

Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.

Security HygieneWeight 15%
45/100

Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.

TransparencyWeight 5%
43/100

Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.

ReputationWeight 5%
50/100

Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.

Operational StabilityWeight 15%
84/100

Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.

Server-side analysis

Automated security checks

Local antivirus and phishing checks

ClamAV · homepage HTMLNo signature match in the sampled HTML
Engine version1.5.4
Signature database date (UTC)2026-10-01T06:24:38+00:00
HTML bytes submitted329,208
Phishing.Database · exact hostnameNot listed in this snapshot
Feed downloaded (UTC)2026-10-01T12:00:06+00:00
Hosts in local snapshot386,078

Sampled scripts and pages

Resource analysis incomplete

6 resources checked · 23 script links observed on the homepage. Partial resource coverage.

ClamAV inspects the fetched homepage HTML on our server. New scans also sample up to four linked scripts and two collected internal pages, with size and time limits. Scripts are not executed. Other downloads, private server files and logged-in pages remain outside this check. A signature match needs investigation and can be a false positive. No match is not a whole-site safety guarantee.

Exact hostname lookup uses a downloaded Phishing.Database snapshot. It does not send this domain to an external lookup API or mark sibling subdomains as harmful. Not listed does not mean safe. Snapshot age is download age, not proof that every entry was recently revalidated.

Homepage HTML only · Eight local rule families · local-security-v2

Checks use the fetched page and redirect chain. Scripts are not executed, forms are not submitted, and linked files are not downloaded. This is not a malware clearance.

Page resource inventory

Linked scripts23
Inline scripts16
Embedded frames1
External script hosts1

Counts describe the sampled HTML, not every resource loaded by the browser. External resources are common and are not automatically harmful.

No listed local patterns observed. The limited rule set cannot detect every threat or behavior.

External threat intelligence

Provider coverageNot checked

Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.

Registration

Domain information

Public RDAP observation
Canonical domaintechnologyreview.jp
RegistrarUnavailable
RegisteredUnavailable
Domain ageUnavailable
ExpiresUnavailable
Registry statusesUnavailable
Report statePublished

Infrastructure

Network & hosting

Observed endpoint, not legal location
IP address54.192.35.116
Autonomous systemUnavailable
Network organizationUnavailable
Observed countryUnavailable
CDNAmazon CloudFront
Web application firewallNot detected

At a glance

Infrastructure summary

Observed during this scan

A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.

HTTP response200 · https://www.technologyreview.jp/
Endpoint54.192.35.116
NetworkUnavailable
CDN and WAFAmazon CloudFront · Not detected
DNS surface16 records · 4 nameservers · 5 mail exchangers
Protection signals1 security headers · 4 technologies · DNSSEC unknown

Page telemetry

Observed page statistics

Safe metadata only

These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.

Response size329,208 bytes
HTTP check duration2,000 ms
Cookies observedUnavailable
Script resources23 · 1 external hosts
Frames and sampled checks1 frames · 6 resources checked

Encrypted transport

TLS certificate

Valid when observed
StatusValid when observed
ProtocolTLSv1.3
IssuercountryName=US, organizationName=Amazon, commonName=Amazon RSA 2048 M04
Valid fromSep 22, 2026
Valid untilApr 7, 2027
Certificate names*.technologyreview.jp · technologyreview.jp

Resolution

DNS footprint

DNSKEY status unknown

DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.

A54.192.35.116TTL —
A54.192.35.21TTL —
A54.192.35.68TTL —
A54.192.35.82TTL —
NSns-1260.awsdns-29.orgTTL —
NSns-1750.awsdns-26.co.ukTTL —
NSns-444.awsdns-55.comTTL —
NSns-601.awsdns-11.netTTL —
MX1 aspmx.l.google.comTTL —
MX10 aspmx2.googlemail.comTTL —
MX10 aspmx3.googlemail.comTTL —
MX5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.comTTL —
MX5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.comTTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=72meEf6HX7rTVqIpK3xf2e0T2C0y6zdVH_l2d0KVu68TTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=ERCXdY-3TGSVJt7XDpzIDiC4Bi8fRbo88okD_J2JfN4TTL —
TXTv=spf1 include:_spf.google.com +ip4:18.177.133.6 +ip4:18.177.188.155 +ip4:54.65.59.170 +ip4:176.34.42.174 include:servers.mcsv.net ~allTTL —

DNS observations · no external lookup API

Domain email protection

Exact-host SPF and DMARC observations help the owner investigate email impersonation risks. They are separate from website malware checks and do not change the Safety Score.

SPFPolicy record observed, not fully validated
DMARCMonitoring-only DMARC policy

What to do next

Review the records with your mail administrator. Inventory legitimate senders and test SPF and DKIM alignment before enforcing a stricter DMARC policy. Fix duplicate records and investigate overly permissive SPF rules.

This bounded check does not send email, probe SMTP, evaluate recursive SPF includes, verify DKIM signatures or apply organizational-domain DMARC inheritance. A missing subdomain record does not prove that no inherited protection exists. A DNS timeout is unknown, not an absent record. A policy record is not proof that messages authenticate successfully.

Responsible disclosure

security.txt

RFC 9116 observation

No readable security.txt file was observed at the standard locations. This is informational and is not evidence of malware.

Browser protections

Security headers

1 observed
x-frame-optionspresent SAMEORIGIN

Response headers

Cookie protections

Passive observation

No Set-Cookie header was observed on the sampled homepage response. Other pages may set cookies separately.

Detected stack

Technologies

Google Tag Manager 96% Nginx 93% WooCommerce 90% WordPress 95%

Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.

JavaScript library advisories

4 sampled JavaScript files checked locally with Retire.js. Database snapshot: 2026-10-01T02:40:06.962Z.

jquery 3.7.1 No known advisories matched this version in the database snapshot.
jquery-migrate 3.4.1 No known advisories matched this version in the database snapshot.

A version match is not proof that the website is infected or that an issue is exploitable here. Owners should review the advisory, check whether their code is affected and test an update. Up to four external script files are sampled, not every dependency, inline script or dynamically loaded resource.

Recommended maintenance checks

NginxReview the Nginx branch and keep security patches current. Avoid exposing detailed server version headers.
WordPressKeep WordPress core, themes and plugins updated. Remove unused plugins and review administrator accounts.

About this website

What the site says about itself

オープンAI財団が、AIの学習用に「高品質な科学データセット」を作る新たな取り組みを始めた。助成先の一つは、経営破綻したバイオテクノロジー企業の破産手続きで、規制当局への申請資料など通常は営業秘密にあたる文書を買い取る構想だ。生物学データの不足が医療AIの最大のボトルネックになっているとの認識が背景にある。

View the site's About page ↗

This is publisher supplied information. The independent safety findings are shown separately.

Publisher supplied

Public contact details

These details were observed on the website, not independently verified as an active support channel.

Emailtermsofservice@technologyreview.jpSource: https://www.technologyreview.jp/about/terms-of-sale/
Emailprivacy@technologyreview.jpSource: https://www.technologyreview.jp/about/terms-of-sale/
Emailcustomer-service@technologyreview.jpSource: https://www.technologyreview.jp/about/terms-of-sale/
Emailfeedback@technologyreview.jpSource: https://www.technologyreview.jp/about/terms-of-sale/
Emailadsales@technologyreview.jpSource: https://www.technologyreview.jp/about/terms-of-sale/
Emailpitches@technologyreview.jpSource: https://www.technologyreview.jp/about/terms-of-sale/

Structured facts

Website identity & response

Public page metadata
Page titleMITテクノロジーレビュー | テクノロジーが形作る世界を理解する
First headingCover Story カメラは何を見ていたのか? 世界有数のAI監視地帯で 移民が亡くなっている
Descriptionテクノロジーが形作る世界を理解する
Canonical URLhttps://www.technologyreview.jp/
Final URLhttps://www.technologyreview.jp/
HTTP response200 · text/html; charset=UTF-8 · 2000 ms
Languageja
Structured typesNone observed
Page page detectedhttps://www.technologyreview.jp/about/terms-of-sale/About page detectedhttps://www.technologyreview.jp/s/391003/ai-models-need-more-data-about-biology-and-openai-is-paying-to-create-it/
missing100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
ja100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
16100% evidence confidence
4100% evidence confidence
5100% evidence confidence
unavailable100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.cname present100% evidence confidence
4100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions policy present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp present100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence

Connection path

Redirect chain

1 recorded hops
Hop 1https://www.technologyreview.jp/

The chain is shown exactly as observed by the scanner. A redirect is not itself a malware finding, but unexpected domains or an HTTP downgrade deserve review.

Premium monitoring

Catch downtime and security changes automatically

Regular checks, availability history, and alert emails are reserved for Premium websites. Free reports remain point-in-time scans and do not create recurring server work.

Enable monitoring for this website

Compared with the previous scan

What changed

A comparison will appear after the next completed scan.

Explainable matching

Digital fingerprint

fingerprint-v1
azure-beacon-wave-622

Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.

DnsHashed private comparison value
TechnologiesHashed private comparison value

Material changes only

Change history

No meaningful changes recorded yet.

Website icon for technologyreview.jp

Visual evidence

Website screenshot

Screenshot of technologyreview.jp
Captured once in an isolated browser during this scan. Visual tint is an interface overlay. The original evidence is not duplicated.

For site owners

Show your verified trust report

Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.

Choose a badge style
Preview on your site
WebsiteVirusScanner trust badge preview

Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.

Questions about technologyreview.jp

FAQ

Still have questions? Contact us →
Is technologyreview.jp safe to visit?

The latest Safety Score is 61/100 with 70% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.

Did the scan detect malware on technologyreview.jp?

ClamAV found no signature match in the sampled homepage HTML. External scripts, downloads and private server files were not checked. This is not a whole-site malware clearance.

When was technologyreview.jp registered?

The registry lookup did not provide a reliable creation date in this scan.

Did technologyreview.jp have a valid TLS certificate?

The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.3. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.

How does technologyreview.jp describe itself?

The website's About page describes its purpose in the report above. This is publisher-supplied information and is separate from independent security findings.

Can a paid listing change this website's score?

No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.