What is this website?
Crypto lost $742.0M across 33 incidents in September 2026, almost three times August's $255.5M and the biggest month of the year so far. Bitget's $387M hack and Liquid Network's $320M exploit account for about 95% of that, with the other 31 incidents adding up to $35.0M. In August, the prices going into contracts were wrong. In September, attackers went after the systems that approve transactions in the first place. Here's the month in security 👇
○ Malware status unverifiedNo external threat-provider verdict is available for this scan.
How to read this report
Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.
No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.
Current report context
What changed since the last scan
- No earlier report to compare
What this scan could verify · 5 observed, 1 unavailable
Unavailable and unperformed checks are not clean results. The detailed evidence below remains the source for each conclusion.
Independent evidence brief
What we observed about quantstamp.com
The latest scan examined 4 public pages on quantstamp.com. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.
Purpose and visible content
On its About page, the site says: Crypto lost $742.0M across 33 incidents in September 2026, almost three times August's $255.5M and the biggest month of the year so far. Bitget's…
- September 2026: The Approval Layer Was ExploitedCrypto lost $742.0M across 33 incidents in September 2026, almost three times August's $255.5M and the biggest month…
- Economic Exploitability | QuantstampExpert audits from the leader in web3 security. Secured over $200 billion in digital assets. Experience includes ETH2.0,…
- OpSec Review | QuantstampQuantstamp reviews the operational security around your protocol across identity, data, pipelines, and cloud, then delivers a prioritized…
Registrar and domain history
A reliable creation date was not returned by the registration lookup. The report leaves domain age unverified rather than guessing.
Connection and hosting evidence
The checked homepage returned HTTP 200 in about 1000 ms.
A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Jan 23, 2027.
Threat checks and score context
External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.
Safety Score: 65/100. Evidence Confidence: 65%. These measure different things.
Community reviews of quantstamp.com
No approved reviews yet
Visitor experiences are separate from the independent technical Safety Score.
Visitor opinions remain separate from the technical Safety Score.
Public content profile
Pages reviewed on quantstamp.com
We sampled public pages from this website to understand its subject and contact paths. The titles and short descriptions below come from the website itself. They are not endorsements or independent safety findings.
At a glance
Key findings
Report is current
The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.
Confidence is separate
Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.
Verify before sensitive actions
Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.
Fully explainable
Why this score?
Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.
Evidence is unavailable.
Observed DNS records and network address were checked.
Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.
Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.
Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.
Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.
Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.
Server-side analysis
Automated security checks
Local HTML checks are unavailable for this report. A new scan can collect them if the homepage is accessible.
External threat intelligence
Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.
Registration
Domain information
Infrastructure
Network & hosting
At a glance
Infrastructure summary
A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.
Page telemetry
Observed page statistics
These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.
Encrypted transport
TLS certificate
Resolution
DNS footprint
DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.
188.114.96.2TTL —188.114.97.2TTL —angela.ns.cloudflare.comTTL —plato.ns.cloudflare.comTTL —1 aspmx.l.google.comTTL —10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.comTTL —10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.comTTL —5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.comTTL —5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.comTTL —0 issue "comodoca.com"TTL —0 issue "digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"TTL —0 issue "letsencrypt.org"TTL —0 issue "pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"TTL —0 issue "ssl.com"TTL —0 issuewild "comodoca.com"TTL —0 issuewild "digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"TTL —0 issuewild "letsencrypt.org"TTL —0 issuewild "pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"TTL —0 issuewild "ssl.com"TTL —8BF4899CF7TTL —ahrefs-site-verification_a867df8eef7b6b069d82aef08d4470f7846a4c5a62b94c318be720324870f35fTTL —amazonses:QtAWzUMHTRucTXDjwfVjnPHHZ+wAZsn3ydsIHQ4SKWs=TTL —atlassian-domain-verification=nA7i7BgI0en3V0TEa6VSETbOjI9O9pfIeYHq6/Iam5/WcbbZzwraLEDOaaYmwAaMTTL —google-site-verification=A9sAaayV5GRJkqkASWd_QJTpCTDbkvMEzd-34CJazhsTTL —hj-ownership=I2uaJS2Fbz9t1KlTTL —MS=ms97168605TTL —v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:mailgun.org include:_spf.google.com ~allTTL —Responsible disclosure
security.txt
No readable security.txt file was observed at the standard locations. This is informational and is not evidence of malware.
Browser protections
Security headers
Response headers
Cookie protections
No Set-Cookie header was observed on the sampled homepage response. Other pages may set cookies separately.
Detected stack
Technologies
Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.
JavaScript library advisories
JavaScript advisory analysis was not recorded for this scan.
Recommended maintenance checks
About this website
What the site says about itself
Crypto lost $742.0M across 33 incidents in September 2026, almost three times August's $255.5M and the biggest month of the year so far. Bitget's $387M hack and Liquid Network's $320M exploit account for about 95% of that, with the other 31 incidents adding up to $35.0M. In August, the prices going into contracts were wrong. In September, attackers went after the systems that approve transactions in the first place. Here's the month in security 👇
This is publisher supplied information. The independent safety findings are shown separately.
Publisher supplied
Social profiles observed on this website
These links appeared on the website. We have not independently verified ownership of the linked accounts.
YouTube
GitHub
LinkedIn
X
X
X
Structured facts
Website identity & response
Connection path
Redirect chain
No redirect hop was recorded for the sampled homepage.
Compared with the previous scan
What changed
A comparison will appear after the next completed scan.
Explainable matching
Digital fingerprint
Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.
Material changes only
Change history
Show change history
No meaningful changes recorded yet.
Visual evidence
Website screenshot
For site owners
Show your verified trust report
Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.
Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.
Questions about quantstamp.com
FAQ
Is quantstamp.com safe to visit?
The latest Safety Score is 65/100 with 65% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.
Did the scan detect malware on quantstamp.com?
External threat-provider coverage was unavailable for this scan, so malware status is unverified.
When was quantstamp.com registered?
The registry lookup did not provide a reliable creation date in this scan.
Did quantstamp.com have a valid TLS certificate?
The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.3. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.
How does quantstamp.com describe itself?
The website's About page describes its purpose in the report above. This is publisher-supplied information and is separate from independent security findings.
Can a paid listing change this website's score?
No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.
Share your experience with quantstamp.com
Community reviews are moderated and remain separate from the technical Safety Score.
Write review →