Website reputation report

prisonpolicy.org

Last checked 2 days ago · Point-in-time assessment

● Evidence is limited

What is this website?

Public pages were observed on prisonpolicy.org, but their subject was not confidently classified. An About page was also found. The sampled pages were marked as English-language. Recurring page-metadata topics include prison policy initiative, criminal legal system, president.

No listed local patterns observedHomepage-only analysis is not a malware clearance. Read the scope and findings below.

69/100Safety Score
75%Evidence Confidence
Trust Radar evidence profile Eight evidence dimensions from zero to one hundred. Exact values surround the chart. Threat Intelligence55 Domain History95 Infrastructure89 Website Security95 Security Hygiene35 Transparency53 Reputation50 Operational Stability84
Trust RadarEight observed factors. Select one to inspect its evidence.

How to read this report

Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.

No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.

Independent evidence brief

What we observed about prisonpolicy.org

Updated Sep 30, 2026

The latest scan examined 10 public pages on prisonpolicy.org. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.

Registrar and domain history

Registered on Aug 23, 2001. Registrar: Tucows Domains Inc..

Recorded expiry date: Aug 23, 2027. Registry data can change.

Connection and hosting evidence

The checked homepage returned HTTP 200 in about 2000 ms.

A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Mar 26, 2027.

Threat checks and score context

External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.

Safety Score: 69/100. Evidence Confidence: 75%. These measure different things.

Public content profile

Pages reviewed on prisonpolicy.org

10 of up to 10 pages

We sampled public pages from this website to understand its subject and contact paths. The titles and short descriptions below come from the website itself. They are not endorsements or independent safety findings.

Hashtags found on the website: #policymadesimple · #creatorinresidence . These are site-supplied labels, not search rankings.

Prison Policy InitiativeThinktank that uses research, advocacy, and organizing to show how over-criminalization harms individuals, our communities, and the national well-being About | Prison Policy InitiativeThe origins, accomplishments and the financials of the Prison Policy Initiative Contact us | Prison Policy InitiativeContact form to get in touch with Prison Policy Initiative staff. Blog | Prison Policy InitiativeResearch and advocacy about how mass incarceration affects individuals, communities and the national welfare. In the News | Prison Policy InitiativeNews coverage and editorials that feature our research Press Releases | Prison Policy InitiativePress releases of the Prison Policy Initiative, a non-profit organization that produces cutting edge research to expose broader harms of mass incarceration Prison Policy InitiativePage with archives of blog posts by author and date Best of the blog | Prison Policy InitiativeResearch and advocacy about how mass incarceration affects individuals, communities and the national welfare. Can they do that? A primer on the powers — and limits — of the president and federal government to shape the criminal legal system | Prison Policy InitiativeThe Trump Administration has made a lot of claims about how it will change the criminal legal system. We explain where the president and federal ... President Trump said, “home-growns are next.” Here’s our response. | Prison Policy InitiativePresident Trump’s recent comments about sending Americans to a Salvadoran prison mark a new, dark turn in the fight to end mass incarceration.

Public page evidence

Topics and keywords observed on prisonpolicy.org

12 phrases

These phrases were extracted locally from sampled public page metadata. They are observations, not search-volume or ranking estimates.

prison policy initiativeTitle, H1, Meta description10 sampled pages
criminal legal systemTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
presidentTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
thatTitle, H1, Meta description4 sampled pages
researchMeta description5 sampled pages
mass incarcerationMeta description4 sampled pages
trumpTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
blogTitle, Meta description3 sampled pages
advocacyMeta description3 sampled pages
communitiesMeta description3 sampled pages
individualsMeta description3 sampled pages
nationalMeta description3 sampled pages

At a glance

Key findings

✓

Report is current

The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.

i

Confidence is separate

Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.

!

Verify before sensitive actions

Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.

Fully explainable

Why this score?

Versioned weights
Threat IntelligenceWeight 25%
55/100

Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.

Domain HistoryWeight 10%
95/100

Domain registration age and expiry were checked.

InfrastructureWeight 10%
89/100

Observed DNS records and network address were checked.

Website SecurityWeight 15%
95/100

Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.

Security HygieneWeight 15%
35/100

Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.

TransparencyWeight 5%
53/100

Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.

ReputationWeight 5%
50/100

Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.

Operational StabilityWeight 15%
84/100

Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.

Server-side analysis

Automated security checks

Local antivirus and phishing checks

ClamAV · homepage HTMLNo signature match in the sampled HTML
Engine version1.5.4
Signature database date (UTC)2026-09-30T06:24:18+00:00
HTML bytes submitted37,570
Phishing.Database · exact hostnameNot listed in this snapshot
Feed downloaded (UTC)2026-09-30T12:00:07+00:00
Hosts in local snapshot386,027

Sampled scripts and pages

Resource analysis incomplete

5 resources checked · 3 script links observed on the homepage. Partial resource coverage.

ClamAV inspects the fetched homepage HTML on our server. New scans also sample up to four linked scripts and two collected internal pages, with size and time limits. Scripts are not executed. Other downloads, private server files and logged-in pages remain outside this check. A signature match needs investigation and can be a false positive. No match is not a whole-site safety guarantee.

Exact hostname lookup uses a downloaded Phishing.Database snapshot. It does not send this domain to an external lookup API or mark sibling subdomains as harmful. Not listed does not mean safe. Snapshot age is download age, not proof that every entry was recently revalidated.

Homepage HTML only · Eight local rule families · local-security-v2

Checks use the fetched page and redirect chain. Scripts are not executed, forms are not submitted, and linked files are not downloaded. This is not a malware clearance.

Page resource inventory

Linked scripts3
Inline scripts2
Embedded frames1
External script hosts2

Counts describe the sampled HTML, not every resource loaded by the browser. External resources are common and are not automatically harmful.

No listed local patterns observed. The limited rule set cannot detect every threat or behavior.

External threat intelligence

Provider coverageNot checked

Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.

Registration

Domain information

Public RDAP observation
Canonical domainprisonpolicy.org
RegistrarTucows Domains Inc.
RegisteredAug 23, 2001
Domain age25 years
ExpiresAug 23, 2027
Registry statusesclient transfer prohibited · client update prohibited
Report statePublished

Infrastructure

Network & hosting

Observed endpoint, not legal location
IP address66.39.118.137
Autonomous systemUnavailable
Network organizationUnavailable
Observed countryUnavailable
CDNNot detected
Web application firewallNot detected

At a glance

Infrastructure summary

Observed during this scan

A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.

HTTP response200 · https://www.prisonpolicy.org/
Endpoint66.39.118.137
NetworkUnavailable
CDN and WAFNot detected · Not detected
DNS surface10 records · 2 nameservers · 5 mail exchangers
Protection signals0 security headers · 4 technologies · DNSSEC unknown

Page telemetry

Observed page statistics

Safe metadata only

These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.

Response size37,570 bytes
HTTP check duration2,000 ms
Cookies observedUnavailable
Script resources3 · 2 external hosts
Frames and sampled checks1 frames · 5 resources checked

Encrypted transport

TLS certificate

Valid when observed
StatusValid when observed
ProtocolTLSv1.3
IssuercountryName=GB, organizationName=Sectigo Limited, commonName=Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36
Valid fromFeb 23, 2026
Valid untilMar 26, 2027
Certificate namesprisonpolicy.org · www.prisonpolicy.org

Resolution

DNS footprint

DNSKEY status unknown

DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.

A66.39.118.137TTL —
NSns000.ns0.comTTL —
NSns549.pair.comTTL —
MX10 aspmx.l.google.comTTL —
MX25 alt1.aspmx.l.google.comTTL —
MX25 alt2.aspmx.l.google.comTTL —
MX50 aspmx2.googlemail.comTTL —
MX50 aspmx3.googlemail.comTTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=yutZHrGUNnBfkOsZ7A-fwiw-QSXw-B-53KXS08joMA0TTL —
TXTv=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.createsend.com include:relay.pair.com a:vps99.pairvps.com ~allTTL —

DNS observations · no external lookup API

Domain email protection

Exact-host SPF and DMARC observations help the owner investigate email impersonation risks. They are separate from website malware checks and do not change the Safety Score.

SPFPolicy record observed, not fully validated
DMARCMonitoring-only DMARC policy

What to do next

Review the records with your mail administrator. Inventory legitimate senders and test SPF and DKIM alignment before enforcing a stricter DMARC policy. Fix duplicate records and investigate overly permissive SPF rules.

This bounded check does not send email, probe SMTP, evaluate recursive SPF includes, verify DKIM signatures or apply organizational-domain DMARC inheritance. A missing subdomain record does not prove that no inherited protection exists. A DNS timeout is unknown, not an absent record. A policy record is not proof that messages authenticate successfully.

Responsible disclosure

security.txt

RFC 9116 observation
StatusPublished and readable
Security contacts0
Policy linkObserved
ExpiryMissing or expired

This is a public vulnerability-reporting contact file. Its presence does not prove that the website is safe and does not change the independent Safety Score.

Browser protections

Security headers

0 observed

Header evidence is unavailable. Missing data is not treated as a clean result or proof of compromise.

Response headers

Cookie protections

Passive observation

No Set-Cookie header was observed on the sampled homepage response. Other pages may set cookies separately.

Detected stack

Technologies

Apache HTTP Server 93% Google Analytics 94% PHP 88% WordPress 95%

Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.

JavaScript library advisories

3 sampled JavaScript files checked locally with Retire.js. Database snapshot: 2026-09-30T02:40:06.930Z.

No supported library version was identified in the sampled files. This does not establish that the scripts are safe.

A version match is not proof that the website is infected or that an issue is exploitable here. Owners should review the advisory, check whether their code is affected and test an update. Up to four external script files are sampled, not every dependency, inline script or dynamically loaded resource.

Recommended maintenance checks

Apache HTTP ServerReview the Apache branch and keep security patches current. Avoid exposing detailed server version headers.
PHPCheck the PHP branch against your host support policy and plan updates before the branch reaches end of security support.
WordPressKeep WordPress core, themes and plugins updated. Remove unused plugins and review administrator accounts.

About this website

What the site says about itself

The origins, accomplishments and the financials of the Prison Policy Initiative

View the site's About page ↗

This is publisher supplied information. The independent safety findings are shown separately.

Structured facts

Website identity & response

Public page metadata
Page titlePrison Policy Initiative
First headingRecommended Reading:
DescriptionThinktank that uses research, advocacy, and organizing to show how over-criminalization harms individuals, our communities, and the national well-being
Canonical URLhttps://www.prisonpolicy.org/
Final URLhttps://www.prisonpolicy.org/
HTTP response200 · text/html; charset=UTF-8 · 2000 ms
Languageen
Structured typesOrganization · WebSite
Page page detectedhttps://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/About page detectedhttps://www.prisonpolicy.org/about.htmlContact page detectedhttps://www.prisonpolicy.org/contact.html
present100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Security txt.has canonical100% evidence confidence
Security txt.expires valid100% evidence confidence
Security txt.contact count100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
en100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors wildcard origin100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors credentials with wildcard100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp present100% evidence confidence
10100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
5100% evidence confidence
unavailable100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.cname present100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions policy present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts present100% evidence confidence

Connection path

Redirect chain

1 recorded hops
Hop 1https://www.prisonpolicy.org/

The chain is shown exactly as observed by the scanner. A redirect is not itself a malware finding, but unexpected domains or an HTTP downgrade deserve review.

Premium monitoring

Catch downtime and security changes automatically

Regular checks, availability history, and alert emails are reserved for Premium websites. Free reports remain point-in-time scans and do not create recurring server work.

Enable monitoring for this website

Compared with the previous scan

What changed

A comparison will appear after the next completed scan.

Explainable matching

Digital fingerprint

fingerprint-v1
bright-beacon-path-952

Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.

DnsHashed private comparison value
TechnologiesHashed private comparison value

Material changes only

Change history

No meaningful changes recorded yet.

Website icon for prisonpolicy.org

Visual evidence

Website screenshot

Screenshot of prisonpolicy.org
Captured once in an isolated browser during this scan. Visual tint is an interface overlay. The original evidence is not duplicated.

For site owners

Show your verified trust report

Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.

Choose a badge style
Preview on your site
WebsiteVirusScanner trust badge preview

Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.

Questions about prisonpolicy.org

FAQ

Still have questions? Contact us →
Is prisonpolicy.org safe to visit?

The latest Safety Score is 69/100 with 75% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.

Did the scan detect malware on prisonpolicy.org?

ClamAV found no signature match in the sampled homepage HTML. External scripts, downloads and private server files were not checked. This is not a whole-site malware clearance.

When was prisonpolicy.org registered?

The public registry record shows Aug 23, 2001. Registration details may be privacy-protected or updated later.

Did prisonpolicy.org have a valid TLS certificate?

The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.3. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.

How does prisonpolicy.org describe itself?

The website's About page describes its purpose in the report above. This is publisher-supplied information and is separate from independent security findings.

Can a paid listing change this website's score?

No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.