Website reputation report

naeo.kr

Last checked 1 day ago · Point-in-time assessment

67/100Technical Safety ScoreIndependent technical assessment, not a visitor rating
Would you recommend this page? No community votes yet 0/0 Your vote is for this page in this report only—not the entire website. No account required · One vote per browser.
Captured homepage of naeo.kr in the current scan
Website screenshot from the current report

Share report

● Evidence is limited

What is this website?

내 블로그 글이 네이버 AI 브리핑에 인용될 준비가 됐는지 네이버 공식 5기준으로 무료 진단하고, 기준에 맞춘 글쓰기까지 코칭해 드립니다.

No listed local patterns observedHomepage-only analysis is not a malware clearance. Read the scope and findings below.

67/100Safety Score
70%Evidence Confidence
Trust Radar evidence profile Eight evidence dimensions from zero to one hundred. Exact values surround the chart. Threat Intelligence55 Domain History0 Infrastructure92 Website Security95 Security Hygiene80 Transparency47 Reputation50 Operational Stability83
Trust RadarEight observed factors. Select one to inspect its evidence.

How to read this report

Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.

No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.

Current report context

What changed since the last scan

  • No earlier report to compare
What this scan could verify · 5 observed, 1 unavailable
DNS observed
Registration lookup unavailable Reason: site connection failed
Network observed
TLS observed
Website response observed
Website content observed

Unavailable and unperformed checks are not clean results. The detailed evidence below remains the source for each conclusion.

Report an inaccuracy in this report →

Independent evidence brief

What we observed about naeo.kr

Updated Oct 11, 2026

The latest scan examined 9 public pages on naeo.kr. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.

Purpose and visible content

On its homepage, the site says: 내 블로그 글이 네이버 AI 브리핑에 인용될 준비가 됐는지 네이버 공식 5기준으로 무료 진단하고, 기준에 맞춘 글쓰기까지 코칭해 드립니다.

Registrar and domain history

A reliable creation date was not returned by the registration lookup. The report leaves domain age unverified rather than guessing.

Connection and hosting evidence

The checked homepage returned HTTP 200 in about 3000 ms.

A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Nov 27, 2026.

Threat checks and score context

External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.

Safety Score: 67/100. Evidence Confidence: 70%. These measure different things.

Community reviews of naeo.kr

No approved reviews yet ☆☆☆☆☆

Visitor experiences are separate from the independent technical Safety Score.

Visitor opinions remain separate from the technical Safety Score.

Public content profile

Pages reviewed on naeo.kr

9 of up to 10 pages

We sampled public pages from this website to understand its subject and contact paths. The titles and short descriptions below come from the website itself. They are not endorsements or independent safety findings.

Hashtags found on the website: #모두의회고 . These are site-supplied labels, not search rankings.

네이버 블로그 AI 브리핑 인용 진단내 블로그 글이 네이버 AI 브리핑에 인용될 준비가 됐는지 네이버 공식 5기준으로 무료 진단하고, 기준에 맞춘 글쓰기까지 코칭해 드립니다. 자주 묻는 질문 | NAEO서비스 이용, ChatGPT·Claude 연결 등 자주 묻는 질문 모음 ChatGPT·Claude에 NAEO 연결하기 | AI로 네이버 블로그 글쓰기 | NAEO나의 ChatGPT·Claude에 NAEO를 연결하면 내 황금 키워드로, 내 블로그 말투로, 이미지까지. AI 검색(AEO)에 최적화된 글이 대화 한 번에 나옵니다. 연결은 몇 단계면 끝. AI 추천 순위 리더보드 | NAEO | NAEO네이버 AI 브리핑에서 AI가 많이 추천한 블로그를 한눈에 확인하세요. 내 블로그, 네이버 메이트 될 수 있을까? 30초 무료 진단 | NAEO네이버가 매달 약 3,000명에게 월 30만원부터 지급하는 네이버 메이트. AI 브리핑 인용 기준 5가지로 내 블로그를 30초 만에 무료 진단해 드려요. NAEO 이벤트 | NAEO진행 중인 NAEO 이벤트와 랭킹 리워드를 한곳에서 확인하세요. NAEO 요금제 | 네이버 AI 검색 최적화 진단 | NAEO무료부터 베이직까지, 내 블로그에 맞는 NAEO 요금제를 확인하세요. 포스팅별 AI 추천 여부 진단, 키워드 경쟁력 분석, 상세 분석 리포트를 제공합니다. 업데이트 | NAEONAEO의 새 기능, 개선 사항, 버그 수정 기록입니다. 환불 규정 | NAEO | NAEONAEO 환불 및 취소 규정입니다.

Public page evidence

Topics and keywords observed on naeo.kr

6 phrases

These phrases were extracted locally from sampled public page metadata. They are observations, not search-volume or ranking estimates.

네이버 aiTitle, Meta description3 sampled pages
ai 브리핑 인용Title, Meta description2 sampled pages
확인하세요Meta description3 sampled pages
chatgptTitle, Meta description2 sampled pages
ai 검색Title, Meta description2 sampled pages
ai 추천Title, Meta description2 sampled pages

At a glance

Key findings

✓

Report is current

The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.

i

Confidence is separate

Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.

!

Verify before sensitive actions

Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.

Fully explainable

Why this score?

Versioned weights
Threat IntelligenceWeight 25%
55/100

Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.

Domain HistoryWeight 10%
0/100

Evidence is unavailable.

InfrastructureWeight 10%
92/100

Observed DNS records and network address were checked.

Website SecurityWeight 15%
95/100

Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.

Security HygieneWeight 15%
80/100

Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.

TransparencyWeight 5%
47/100

Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.

ReputationWeight 5%
50/100

Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.

Operational StabilityWeight 15%
83/100

Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.

Server-side analysis

Automated security checks

Local antivirus and phishing checks

ClamAV · homepage HTMLNo signature match in the sampled HTML
Engine version1.5.4
Signature database date (UTC)2026-10-11T06:26:01+00:00
HTML bytes submitted577,972
Phishing.Database · exact hostnameNot listed in this snapshot
Feed downloaded (UTC)2026-10-11T12:00:11+00:00
Hosts in local snapshot386,082

Sampled scripts and pages

Resource analysis incomplete

6 resources checked · 25 script links observed on the homepage. Partial resource coverage.

ClamAV inspects the fetched homepage HTML on our server. New scans also sample up to four linked scripts and two collected internal pages, with size and time limits. Scripts are not executed. Other downloads, private server files and logged-in pages remain outside this check. A signature match needs investigation and can be a false positive. No match is not a whole-site safety guarantee.

Exact hostname lookup uses a downloaded Phishing.Database snapshot. It does not send this domain to an external lookup API or mark sibling subdomains as harmful. Not listed does not mean safe. Snapshot age is download age, not proof that every entry was recently revalidated.

Homepage HTML only · Eight local rule families · local-security-v2

Checks use the fetched page and redirect chain. Scripts are not executed, forms are not submitted, and linked files are not downloaded. This is not a malware clearance.

Page resource inventory

Linked scripts25
Inline scripts5
Embedded frames1
External script hosts0

Counts describe the sampled HTML, not every resource loaded by the browser. External resources are common and are not automatically harmful.

Partial analysis. Only the first 512 KiB of the page were inspected.

No listed local patterns observed. The limited rule set cannot detect every threat or behavior.

External threat intelligence

Provider coverageNot checked

Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.

Registration

Domain information

Public RDAP observation
Canonical domainnaeo.kr
RegistrarUnavailable
RegisteredUnavailable
Domain ageUnavailable
ExpiresUnavailable
Registry statusesUnavailable
Report statePublished

Infrastructure

Network & hosting

Observed endpoint, not legal location
IP address216.150.1.193
Autonomous systemUnavailable
Network organizationUnavailable
Observed countryUnavailable
CDNNot detected
Web application firewallNot detected

At a glance

Infrastructure summary

Observed during this scan

A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.

HTTP response200 · https://www.naeo.kr/
Endpoint216.150.1.193
NetworkUnavailable
CDN and WAFNot detected · Not detected
DNS surface11 records · 2 nameservers · 1 mail exchangers
Protection signals7 security headers · 2 technologies · DNSSEC unknown

Page telemetry

Observed page statistics

Safe metadata only

These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.

Response size577,972 bytes
HTTP check duration3,000 ms
Cookies observedUnavailable
Script resources25 · 0 external hosts
Frames and sampled checks1 frames · 6 resources checked

Encrypted transport

TLS certificate

Valid when observed
StatusValid when observed
ProtocolTLSv1.3
IssuercountryName=US, organizationName=Let's Encrypt, commonName=YR2
Valid fromAug 29, 2026
Valid untilNov 27, 2026
Certificate names*.naeo.kr · naeo.kr

Resolution

DNS footprint

DNSKEY status unknown

DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.

A216.150.1.193TTL —
A216.150.1.65TTL —
NSns1.vercel-dns.comTTL —
NSns2.vercel-dns.comTTL —
MX1 smtp.google.comTTL —
CAA0 issue "letsencrypt.org"TTL —
CAA0 issue "pki.goog"TTL —
CAA0 issue "sectigo.com"TTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=F5LPwpes1pGLTfDJLflSXFYx_Ux4SuQmhQbmTjV0fSETTL —
TXTmailer.domain.verification=U281GmOoIkNwmjf4R7kGg1qHzBpkXETTL —
TXTv=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:email.ncloud.com ~allTTL —

DNS observations · no external lookup API

Domain email protection

Exact-host SPF and DMARC observations help the owner investigate email impersonation risks. They are separate from website malware checks and do not change the Safety Score.

SPFPolicy record observed, not fully validated
DMARCPolicy record observed, not fully validated

What to do next

Review the records with your mail administrator. Inventory legitimate senders and test SPF and DKIM alignment before enforcing a stricter DMARC policy. Fix duplicate records and investigate overly permissive SPF rules.

This bounded check does not send email, probe SMTP, evaluate recursive SPF includes, verify DKIM signatures or apply organizational-domain DMARC inheritance. A missing subdomain record does not prove that no inherited protection exists. A DNS timeout is unknown, not an absent record. A policy record is not proof that messages authenticate successfully.

Responsible disclosure

security.txt

RFC 9116 observation

No readable security.txt file was observed at the standard locations. This is informational and is not evidence of malware.

Browser protections

Security headers

7 observed
content-security-policypresent default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://democpay.payple.kr https://cpay.payple.kr https://code.jquery.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://t1.kakaocdn.net https://developers.kakao.com https://www.clarity.ms https://*.clarity.ms https://connect.facebook.net https://static.ads-twitter.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https: http:; font-src 'self' data:; connect-src 'self' https://*.supabase.co wss://*.supabase.co https://*.payple.kr https://www.google-analytics.com https://region1.google-analytics.com https://analytics.google.com https://www.google.com https://*.g.doubleclick.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://*.ingest.us.sentry.io https://www.facebook.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://analytics.twitter.com https://ads-twitter.com https://ads-api.twitter.com; frame-src https://democpay.payple.kr https://cpay.payple.kr https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.facebook.com https://www.youtube-nocookie.com; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self' https://*.payple.kr https://www.facebook.com; frame-ancestors 'none'
cross-origin-opener-policypresent same-origin-allow-popups
permissions-policypresent camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), interest-cohort=()
referrer-policypresent strict-origin-when-cross-origin
strict-transport-securitypresent max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
x-content-type-optionspresent nosniff
x-frame-optionspresent DENY

Response headers

Cookie protections

Passive observation

No Set-Cookie header was observed on the sampled homepage response. Other pages may set cookies separately.

Detected stack

Technologies

Google Tag Manager 96% Next.js 96%

Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.

JavaScript library advisories

4 sampled JavaScript files checked locally with Retire.js. Database snapshot: 2026-10-11T02:40:11.666Z.

react-dom 19.3.0-canary-cbb046ab-20260731 No known advisories matched this version in the database snapshot.

A version match is not proof that the website is infected or that an issue is exploitable here. Owners should review the advisory, check whether their code is affected and test an update. Up to four external script files are sampled, not every dependency, inline script or dynamically loaded resource.

Recommended maintenance checks

Next.jsKeep Next.js and its runtime dependencies current, especially when server-side rendering is enabled.

Publisher supplied

Public contact details

These details were observed on the website, not independently verified as an active support channel.

Emailask@naeo.krSource: https://www.naeo.kr/

Structured facts

Website identity & response

Public page metadata
Page title네이버 블로그 AI 브리핑 인용 진단
First heading내 블로그 포스팅_AI에 선택되고 있을까?
Description내 블로그 글이 네이버 AI 브리핑에 인용될 준비가 됐는지 네이버 공식 5기준으로 무료 진단하고, 기준에 맞춘 글쓰기까지 코칭해 드립니다.
Canonical URLhttps://www.naeo.kr
Final URLhttps://www.naeo.kr/
HTTP response200 · text/html; charset=utf-8 · 3000 ms
Languageko
Structured typesHowTo · Organization · SoftwareApplication
Faq page detectedhttps://www.naeo.kr/faqPage page detectedhttps://www.naeo.kr/mcp
missing100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
ko100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors credentials with wildcard100% evidence confidence
same-origin-allow-popups100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors present100% evidence confidence
11100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
unavailable100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.cname present100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions usb restricted100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions payment restricted100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
63072000100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp wildcard sources100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors wildcard origin100% evidence confidence

Connection path

Redirect chain

1 recorded hops
Hop 1https://www.naeo.kr/

The chain is shown exactly as observed by the scanner. A redirect is not itself a malware finding, but unexpected domains or an HTTP downgrade deserve review.

Premium monitoring

Catch downtime and security changes automatically

Regular checks, availability history, and alert emails are reserved for Premium websites. Free reports remain point-in-time scans and do not create recurring server work.

Enable monitoring for this website

Compared with the previous scan

What changed

A comparison will appear after the next completed scan.

Explainable matching

Digital fingerprint

fingerprint-v1
deep-vector-path-229

Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.

DnsHashed private comparison value
TechnologiesHashed private comparison value

Material changes only

Change history

Show change history

No meaningful changes recorded yet.

Website icon for naeo.kr

Visual evidence

Website screenshot

Screenshot of naeo.kr
Captured once in an isolated browser during this scan. Visual tint is an interface overlay. The original evidence is not duplicated.

For site owners

Show your verified trust report

Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.

Choose a badge style
Preview on your site
WebsiteVirusScanner trust badge preview

Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.

Questions about naeo.kr

FAQ

Still have questions? Contact us →
Is naeo.kr safe to visit?

The latest Safety Score is 67/100 with 70% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.

Did the scan detect malware on naeo.kr?

ClamAV found no signature match in the sampled homepage HTML. External scripts, downloads and private server files were not checked. This is not a whole-site malware clearance.

When was naeo.kr registered?

The registry lookup did not provide a reliable creation date in this scan.

Did naeo.kr have a valid TLS certificate?

The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.3. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.

Can a paid listing change this website's score?

No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.

Share your experience with naeo.kr

Community reviews are moderated and remain separate from the technical Safety Score.

Write review →