Website reputation report

infoq.com

Last checked 2 days ago · Point-in-time assessment

● Evidence is limited

What is this website?

infoq.com is currently classified in the Software category based on observed public pages. An About page was also found. The sampled pages were marked as English-language. Recurring page-metadata topics include cloudflare, metrics, workers.

No listed local patterns observedHomepage-only analysis is not a malware clearance. Read the scope and findings below.

71/100Safety Score
75%Evidence Confidence
Trust Radar evidence profile Eight evidence dimensions from zero to one hundred. Exact values surround the chart. Threat Intelligence55 Domain History95 Infrastructure91 Website Security84 Security Hygiene55 Transparency58 Reputation50 Operational Stability83
Trust RadarEight observed factors. Select one to inspect its evidence.

How to read this report

Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.

No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.

Independent evidence brief

What we observed about infoq.com

Updated Sep 29, 2026

The latest scan examined 9 public pages on infoq.com. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.

Purpose and visible content

On its About page, the site says: Cloudflare has made Python Workers generally available, built on PEP 783 and on socket syscalls implemented over the Workers connect API. The announcement carries…

Registrar and domain history

Registered on Mar 29, 1996. Registrar: CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH d/b/a joker.com.

Recorded expiry date: Mar 30, 2027. Registry data can change.

Connection and hosting evidence

The checked homepage returned HTTP 200 in about 3000 ms.

A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Mar 30, 2027.

Threat checks and score context

External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.

Safety Score: 71/100. Evidence Confidence: 75%. These measure different things.

Public content profile

Pages reviewed on infoq.com

9 of up to 10 pages

We sampled public pages from this website to understand its subject and contact paths. The titles and short descriptions below come from the website itself. They are not endorsements or independent safety findings.

InfoQ: Software Development News, Trends & Best Practices - InfoQHelping dev teams adopt new technologies and practices. Written by software engineers. Read by over 1.5 million developers worldwide. Python Workers Reach GA on Cloudflare, with Questions About Cold Starts and Upstream Maintenance - InfoQCloudflare has made Python Workers generally available, built on PEP 783 and on socket syscalls implemented over the Workers connect API. The announcement carries no performance fi About InfoQ - InfoQHelping dev teams adopt new technologies and practices. Written by software engineers. Read by over 1.5 million developers worldwide. News > Page #1 - InfoQConcisely written News on tools and libraries from Google, Lyft, Netflix, and more Amazon CloudWatch Omni Extends CloudWatch into the Agent Era - InfoQRecently launched, Amazon CloudWatch Omni is an AI-first observability platform designed to monitor, evaluate, and troubleshoot applications and autonomous AI agents in a unified e Kubernetes Teams Get a Safer Way to See Their Own GPU Metrics - InfoQAdobe engineers have described an open-source approach for giving teams self-service access to their own Prometheus metrics in multi-tenant Kubernetes environments, without exposin Spring News Roundup: Second Milestone Releases of Boot, Framework, Data, Security, Integration - InfoQThere was a flurry of activity during the week of September 21st, 2026, highlighting: second milestone releases of: Spring Boot, Spring Batch, Spring Security, Spring AMQP, Spring Atlassian Rebuilds Metrics Pipeline Around OpenTelemetry at Massive Scale - InfoQSoftware company Atlassian has published an account of its migration from gostatsd to OpenTelemetry, replacing the internal workings of a metrics platform that receives data from a Cloudflare Worker Previews: Per-Branch Environments for Workers - InfoQCloudflare has introduced Worker Previews. This feature allows each Git branch to have its own isolated, production-like environment for a Worker. Each environment has a stable URL

Public page evidence

Topics and keywords observed on infoq.com

11 phrases

These phrases were extracted locally from sampled public page metadata. They are observations, not search-volume or ranking estimates.

cloudflareTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
metricsTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
workersTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
softwareTitle, H1, Meta description3 sampled pages
teamsTitle, H1, Meta description3 sampled pages
dataTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
environmentsTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
engineersMeta description3 sampled pages
overMeta description3 sampled pages
writtenMeta description3 sampled pages
practicesTitle, Meta description2 sampled pages

At a glance

Key findings

✓

Report is current

The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.

i

Confidence is separate

Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.

!

Verify before sensitive actions

Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.

Fully explainable

Why this score?

Versioned weights
Threat IntelligenceWeight 25%
55/100

Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.

Domain HistoryWeight 10%
95/100

Domain registration age and expiry were checked.

InfrastructureWeight 10%
91/100

Observed DNS records and network address were checked.

Website SecurityWeight 15%
84/100

Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.

Security HygieneWeight 15%
55/100

Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.

TransparencyWeight 5%
58/100

Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.

ReputationWeight 5%
50/100

Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.

Operational StabilityWeight 15%
83/100

Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.

Server-side analysis

Automated security checks

Local antivirus and phishing checks

ClamAV · homepage HTMLNo signature match in the sampled HTML
Engine version1.5.4
Signature database date (UTC)2026-09-29T06:26:15+00:00
HTML bytes submitted245,527
Phishing.Database · exact hostnameNot listed in this snapshot
Feed downloaded (UTC)2026-09-29T18:00:06+00:00
Hosts in local snapshot386,017

Sampled scripts and pages

Resource analysis incomplete

6 resources checked · 5 script links observed on the homepage. Partial resource coverage.

ClamAV inspects the fetched homepage HTML on our server. New scans also sample up to four linked scripts and two collected internal pages, with size and time limits. Scripts are not executed. Other downloads, private server files and logged-in pages remain outside this check. A signature match needs investigation and can be a false positive. No match is not a whole-site safety guarantee.

Exact hostname lookup uses a downloaded Phishing.Database snapshot. It does not send this domain to an external lookup API or mark sibling subdomains as harmful. Not listed does not mean safe. Snapshot age is download age, not proof that every entry was recently revalidated.

Homepage HTML only · Eight local rule families · local-security-v2

Checks use the fetched page and redirect chain. Scripts are not executed, forms are not submitted, and linked files are not downloaded. This is not a malware clearance.

Page resource inventory

Linked scripts5
Inline scripts24
Embedded frames2
External script hosts2

Counts describe the sampled HTML, not every resource loaded by the browser. External resources are common and are not automatically harmful.

No listed local patterns observed. The limited rule set cannot detect every threat or behavior.

External threat intelligence

Provider coverageNot checked

Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.

Registration

Domain information

Public RDAP observation
Canonical domaininfoq.com
RegistrarCSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH d/b/a joker.com
RegisteredMar 29, 1996
Domain age30 years
ExpiresMar 30, 2027
Registry statusesclient transfer prohibited
Report statePublished

Infrastructure

Network & hosting

Observed endpoint, not legal location
IP address35.80.203.38
Autonomous systemUnavailable
Network organizationUnavailable
Observed countryUnavailable
CDNNot detected
Web application firewallNot detected

At a glance

Infrastructure summary

Observed during this scan

A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.

HTTP response200 · https://www.infoq.com/
Endpoint35.80.203.38
NetworkUnavailable
CDN and WAFNot detected · Not detected
DNS surface15 records · 4 nameservers · 6 mail exchangers
Protection signals3 security headers · 2 technologies · DNSSEC unknown

Page telemetry

Observed page statistics

Safe metadata only

These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.

Response size245,527 bytes
HTTP check duration3,000 ms
Cookies observed3
Script resources5 · 2 external hosts
Frames and sampled checks2 frames · 6 resources checked

Encrypted transport

TLS certificate

Valid when observed
StatusValid when observed
ProtocolTLSv1.2
IssuercountryName=US, organizationName=Amazon, commonName=Amazon RSA 2048 M01
Valid fromSep 14, 2026
Valid untilMar 30, 2027
Certificate names*.infoq.com · infoq.com

Resolution

DNS footprint

DNSKEY status unknown

DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.

A35.80.203.38TTL —
A35.85.170.204TTL —
A52.39.209.169TTL —
NSns-1373.awsdns-43.orgTTL —
NSns-160.awsdns-20.comTTL —
NSns-1969.awsdns-54.co.ukTTL —
NSns-514.awsdns-00.netTTL —
MX1 aspmx.l.google.comTTL —
MX10 aspmx2.googlemail.comTTL —
MX10 aspmx3.googlemail.comTTL —
MX10 aspmx4.googlemail.comTTL —
MX5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.comTTL —
MX5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.comTTL —
TXTbrevo-code:ddff45e0e8ae620f2868965a08245863TTL —
TXTv=spf1 mx include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com ~allTTL —

DNS observations · no external lookup API

Domain email protection

Exact-host SPF and DMARC observations help the owner investigate email impersonation risks. They are separate from website malware checks and do not change the Safety Score.

SPFPolicy record observed, not fully validated
DMARCPolicy record observed, not fully validated

What to do next

Review the records with your mail administrator. Inventory legitimate senders and test SPF and DKIM alignment before enforcing a stricter DMARC policy. Fix duplicate records and investigate overly permissive SPF rules.

This bounded check does not send email, probe SMTP, evaluate recursive SPF includes, verify DKIM signatures or apply organizational-domain DMARC inheritance. A missing subdomain record does not prove that no inherited protection exists. A DNS timeout is unknown, not an absent record. A policy record is not proof that messages authenticate successfully.

Responsible disclosure

security.txt

RFC 9116 observation

No readable security.txt file was observed at the standard locations. This is informational and is not evidence of malware.

Browser protections

Security headers

3 observed
content-security-policypresent frame-ancestors 'self'
x-content-type-optionspresent nosniff
x-frame-optionspresent DENY

Response headers

Cookie protections

Passive observation
Cookies observed3
Missing Secure2
Missing HttpOnly2
Missing SameSite2

Only cookie attribute counts are retained. Cookie names and values are never stored. These observations are not proof of compromise and do not independently change the Safety Score.

Detected stack

Technologies

Apache HTTP Server 93% Google Tag Manager 96%

Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.

JavaScript library advisories

4 sampled JavaScript files checked locally with Retire.js. Database snapshot: 2026-09-29T02:40:05.559Z.

jquery 1.11.1 5 known advisories. CVE-2015-9251 CVE-2019-11358 CVE-2020-11023
jquery-migrate 1.2.1 1 known advisories.
moment.js 2.1.0 4 known advisories. CVE-2016-4055 CVE-2017-18214 CVE-2022-24785

A version match is not proof that the website is infected or that an issue is exploitable here. Owners should review the advisory, check whether their code is affected and test an update. Up to four external script files are sampled, not every dependency, inline script or dynamically loaded resource.

Recommended maintenance checks

Apache HTTP ServerReview the Apache branch and keep security patches current. Avoid exposing detailed server version headers.

About this website

What the site says about itself

Cloudflare has made Python Workers generally available, built on PEP 783 and on socket syscalls implemented over the Workers connect API. The announcement carries no performance figures. A urllib3 mai

View the site's About page ↗

This is publisher supplied information. The independent safety findings are shown separately.

Publisher supplied

Public contact details

These details were observed on the website, not independently verified as an active support channel.

Emailfeedback@infoq.comSource: https://www.infoq.com/
Emailsales@infoq.comSource: https://www.infoq.com/
Emaileditors@infoq.comSource: https://www.infoq.com/
Emailmarketing@infoq.comSource: https://www.infoq.com/

Structured facts

Website identity & response

Public page metadata
Page titleInfoQ: Software Development News, Trends & Best Practices - InfoQ
First headingInfoQ Homepage
DescriptionHelping dev teams adopt new technologies and practices. Written by software engineers. Read by over 1.5 million developers worldwide.
Canonical URLhttps://www.infoq.com/
Final URLhttps://www.infoq.com/
HTTP response200 · text/html;charset=utf-8 · 3000 ms
Languageen
Structured typesWebSite
Page page detectedhttps://www.infoq.com/news/About page detectedhttps://www.infoq.com/news/2026/09/cloudflare-python-workers-ga/
3100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.cname present100% evidence confidence
unavailable100% evidence confidence
6100% evidence confidence
4100% evidence confidence
15100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
3100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors credentials with wildcard100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors wildcard origin100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp has default src100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp has object src100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp unsafe eval100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp unsafe inline100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp wildcard sources100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions policy present100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
en100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
missing100% evidence confidence

Connection path

Redirect chain

1 recorded hops
Hop 1https://www.infoq.com/

The chain is shown exactly as observed by the scanner. A redirect is not itself a malware finding, but unexpected domains or an HTTP downgrade deserve review.

Premium monitoring

Catch downtime and security changes automatically

Regular checks, availability history, and alert emails are reserved for Premium websites. Free reports remain point-in-time scans and do not create recurring server work.

Enable monitoring for this website

Compared with the previous scan

What changed

A comparison will appear after the next completed scan.

Explainable matching

Digital fingerprint

fingerprint-v1
azure-vector-mesh-358

Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.

DnsHashed private comparison value
TechnologiesHashed private comparison value

Material changes only

Change history

No meaningful changes recorded yet.

Website icon for infoq.com

Visual evidence

Website screenshot

Screenshot of infoq.com
Captured once in an isolated browser during this scan. Visual tint is an interface overlay. The original evidence is not duplicated.

For site owners

Show your verified trust report

Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.

Choose a badge style
Preview on your site
WebsiteVirusScanner trust badge preview

Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.

Questions about infoq.com

FAQ

Still have questions? Contact us →
Is infoq.com safe to visit?

The latest Safety Score is 71/100 with 75% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.

Did the scan detect malware on infoq.com?

ClamAV found no signature match in the sampled homepage HTML. External scripts, downloads and private server files were not checked. This is not a whole-site malware clearance.

When was infoq.com registered?

The public registry record shows Mar 29, 1996. Registration details may be privacy-protected or updated later.

Did infoq.com have a valid TLS certificate?

The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.2. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.

How does infoq.com describe itself?

The website's About page describes its purpose in the report above. This is publisher-supplied information and is separate from independent security findings.

Can a paid listing change this website's score?

No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.