Website reputation report

gznf.net

Last checked 2 weeks ago · Point-in-time assessment

72/100Technical Safety ScoreIndependent technical assessment, not a visitor rating
Would you recommend this page? No community votes yet 0/0 Your vote is for this page in this report only—not the entire website. No account required · One vote per browser.
Captured homepage of gznf.net in the current scan
Website screenshot from the current report

Share report

● Evidence is limited

What is this website?

广州,是一座拥有两千多年历史的城市,也是一座不断变化的现代都市。

No listed local patterns observedHomepage-only analysis is not a malware clearance. Read the scope and findings below.

72/100Safety Score
75%Evidence Confidence
Trust Radar evidence profile Eight evidence dimensions from zero to one hundred. Exact values surround the chart. Threat Intelligence55 Domain History95 Infrastructure91 Website Security95 Security Hygiene50 Transparency52 Reputation50 Operational Stability85
Trust RadarEight observed factors. Select one to inspect its evidence.

How to read this report

Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.

No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.

Current report context

What changed since the last scan

  • No earlier report to compare
What this scan could verify · 6 observed, 0 unavailable
DNS observed
Registration lookup observed
Network observed
TLS observed
Website response observed
Website content observed

Unavailable and unperformed checks are not clean results. The detailed evidence below remains the source for each conclusion.

Report an inaccuracy in this report →

Independent evidence brief

What we observed about gznf.net

Updated Oct 24, 2026

The latest scan examined 8 public pages on gznf.net. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.

Purpose and visible content

On its About page, the site says: 广州,是一座拥有两千多年历史的城市,也是一座不断变化的现代都市。

Registrar and domain history

Registered on Jul 15, 2001. Registrar: PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com.

Recorded expiry date: Jul 15, 2031. Registry data can change.

Connection and hosting evidence

The checked homepage returned HTTP 200 in about 1000 ms.

A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Nov 26, 2026.

Threat checks and score context

External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.

Safety Score: 72/100. Evidence Confidence: 75%. These measure different things.

Community reviews of gznf.net

No approved reviews yet ☆☆☆☆☆

Visitor experiences are separate from the independent technical Safety Score.

Visitor opinions remain separate from the technical Safety Score.

Public content profile

Pages reviewed on gznf.net

8 of up to 10 pages

We sampled public pages from this website to understand its subject and contact paths. The titles and short descriptions below come from the website itself. They are not endorsements or independent safety findings.

羊城网 - 爱广州,识广州……羊城网创办于2000年12月26日。自互联网在中国逐渐普及之初,我们便开始从本土视角出发,记录广州的城市生活,整理岭南的历史文化,关注市民的日常经验与时代变化。从最初的电子杂志、独立网站和互动社区,到后来的微信公众号、新闻客户端、短视频和社交媒体平台,羊城网伴随着一代又一代广州网友共同成长,也见证了互联网传播方式和城市生活的不断改变。 关于我们 - 羊城网广州,是一座拥有两千多年历史的城市,也是一座不断变化的现代都市。 合作联系 - 羊城网我们喜欢与重视本土市场需求与文化语境,并希望进行长期经营的品牌展开合作。 如需联系,请通过电子邮件( [email protected] )简要说明项目背景与需求。 粤语文化将走入的历史岔路:逐渐式微还是文艺复兴? - 羊城网“人其实天生奔放贪玩, 关于劳震宇先生肖像权和名誉权受侵害的律师声明 - 羊城网律师声明: 羊城网:相伴廿年,继续向前! - 羊城网2000年12月26日, 状告骏壹万邦,赢了!因这官司并非只为自己友而打…… - 羊城网最近,我们成为了不少新闻报道中的“某公司”。这些新闻所报道的,是我们与骏壹万邦的一场关于知识产权的官司。 纽约也有「广东道」?Canton究竟是广州,还是广东? - 羊城网为什么纽约会出现一条以广东为名的街道?而Canton不是广州的英文旧称吗?为什么香港和纽约,都把它用在“广东”相关的地名上?难道香港人一百多年前已经翻译错了,而纽约人今天又跟着错?

At a glance

Key findings

✓

Report is current

The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.

i

Confidence is separate

Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.

!

Verify before sensitive actions

Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.

Fully explainable

Why this score?

Versioned weights
Threat IntelligenceWeight 25%
55/100

Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.

Domain HistoryWeight 10%
95/100

Domain registration age and expiry were checked.

InfrastructureWeight 10%
91/100

Observed DNS records and network address were checked.

Website SecurityWeight 15%
95/100

Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.

Security HygieneWeight 15%
50/100

Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.

TransparencyWeight 5%
52/100

Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.

ReputationWeight 5%
50/100

Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.

Operational StabilityWeight 15%
85/100

Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.

Server-side analysis

Automated security checks

Local antivirus and phishing checks

ClamAV · homepage HTMLNo signature match in the sampled HTML
Engine version1.5.4
Signature database date (UTC)2026-10-23T06:24:08+00:00
HTML bytes submitted82,406
Phishing.Database · exact hostnameNot listed in this snapshot
Feed downloaded (UTC)2026-10-24T12:00:08+00:00
Hosts in local snapshot386,082

Sampled scripts and pages

Resource analysis incomplete

5 resources checked · 8 script links observed on the homepage. Partial resource coverage.

ClamAV inspects the fetched homepage HTML on our server. New scans also sample up to four linked scripts and two collected internal pages, with size and time limits. Scripts are not executed. Other downloads, private server files and logged-in pages remain outside this check. A signature match needs investigation and can be a false positive. No match is not a whole-site safety guarantee.

Exact hostname lookup uses a downloaded Phishing.Database snapshot. It does not send this domain to an external lookup API or mark sibling subdomains as harmful. Not listed does not mean safe. Snapshot age is download age, not proof that every entry was recently revalidated.

Homepage HTML only · Eight local rule families · local-security-v2

Checks use the fetched page and redirect chain. Scripts are not executed, forms are not submitted, and linked files are not downloaded. This is not a malware clearance.

Page resource inventory

Linked scripts8
Inline scripts3
Embedded frames0
External script hosts0

Counts describe the sampled HTML, not every resource loaded by the browser. External resources are common and are not automatically harmful.

No listed local patterns observed. The limited rule set cannot detect every threat or behavior.

External threat intelligence

Provider coverageNot checked

Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.

Registration

Domain information

Public RDAP observation
Canonical domaingznf.net
RegistrarPDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
RegisteredJul 15, 2001
Domain age25 years
ExpiresJul 15, 2031
Registry statusesclient transfer prohibited
Report statePublished

Infrastructure

Network & hosting

Observed endpoint, not legal location
IP address104.21.79.254
Autonomous systemUnavailable
Network organizationUnavailable
Observed countryUnavailable
CDNCloudflare
Web application firewallNot detected

At a glance

Infrastructure summary

Observed during this scan

A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.

HTTP response200 · https://www.gznf.net/
Endpoint104.21.79.254
NetworkUnavailable
CDN and WAFCloudflare · Not detected
DNS surface8 records · 2 nameservers · 1 mail exchangers
Protection signals1 security headers · 3 technologies · DNSSEC unknown

Page telemetry

Observed page statistics

Safe metadata only

These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.

Response size82,406 bytes
HTTP check duration1,000 ms
Cookies observedUnavailable
Script resources8 · 0 external hosts
Frames and sampled checks0 frames · 5 resources checked

Encrypted transport

TLS certificate

Valid when observed
StatusValid when observed
ProtocolTLSv1.3
IssuercountryName=US, organizationName=Let's Encrypt, commonName=YE2
Valid fromAug 28, 2026
Valid untilNov 26, 2026
Certificate names*.gznf.net · gznf.net

Resolution

DNS footprint

DNSKEY status unknown

DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.

A104.21.79.254TTL —
A172.67.172.82TTL —
AAAA2606:4700:3031::6815:4ffeTTL —
AAAA2606:4700:3037::ac43:ac52TTL —
NScruz.ns.cloudflare.comTTL —
NSigor.ns.cloudflare.comTTL —
MX1 smtp.google.comTTL —
TXTv=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~allTTL —

DNS observations · no external lookup API

Domain email protection

Exact-host SPF and DMARC observations help the owner investigate email impersonation risks. They are separate from website malware checks and do not change the Safety Score.

SPFPolicy record observed, not fully validated
DMARCMonitoring-only DMARC policy

What to do next

Review the records with your mail administrator. Inventory legitimate senders and test SPF and DKIM alignment before enforcing a stricter DMARC policy. Fix duplicate records and investigate overly permissive SPF rules.

This bounded check does not send email, probe SMTP, evaluate recursive SPF includes, verify DKIM signatures or apply organizational-domain DMARC inheritance. A missing subdomain record does not prove that no inherited protection exists. A DNS timeout is unknown, not an absent record. A policy record is not proof that messages authenticate successfully.

Responsible disclosure

security.txt

RFC 9116 observation

No readable security.txt file was observed at the standard locations. This is informational and is not evidence of malware.

Browser protections

Security headers

1 observed
strict-transport-securitypresent max-age=31536000

Response headers

Cookie protections

Passive observation

No Set-Cookie header was observed on the sampled homepage response. Other pages may set cookies separately.

Detected stack

Technologies

Bootstrap 80% Cloudflare 98% WordPress 95%

Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.

JavaScript library advisories

3 sampled JavaScript files checked locally with Retire.js. Database snapshot: 2026-10-24T02:40:09.471Z.

jquery 3.7.1 No known advisories matched this version in the database snapshot.
jquery-migrate 3.4.1 No known advisories matched this version in the database snapshot.

A version match is not proof that the website is infected or that an issue is exploitable here. Owners should review the advisory, check whether their code is affected and test an update. Up to four external script files are sampled, not every dependency, inline script or dynamically loaded resource.

Recommended maintenance checks

WordPressKeep WordPress core, themes and plugins updated. Remove unused plugins and review administrator accounts.

About this website

What the site says about itself

广州,是一座拥有两千多年历史的城市,也是一座不断变化的现代都市。

View the site's About page ↗

This is publisher supplied information. The independent safety findings are shown separately.

Structured facts

Website identity & response

Public page metadata
Page title羊城网 - 爱广州,识广州……
First headingUnavailable
Description羊城网创办于2000年12月26日。自互联网在中国逐渐普及之初,我们便开始从本土视角出发,记录广州的城市生活,整理岭南的历史文化,关注市民的日常经验与时代变化。从最初的电子杂志、独立网站和互动社区,到后来的微信公众号、新闻客户端、短视频和社交媒体平台,羊城网伴随着一代又一代广州网友共同成长,也见证了互联网传播方式和城市生活的不断改变。
Canonical URLhttps://www.gznf.net
Final URLhttps://www.gznf.net/
HTTP response200 · text/html; charset=UTF-8 · 1000 ms
Languagezh
Structured typesCollectionPage · Corporation · WebSite
Page page detectedhttps://www.gznf.net/category/newsAbout page detectedhttps://www.gznf.net/aboutContact page detectedhttps://www.gznf.net/contact
missing100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
zh100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
8100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
unavailable100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.cname present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors wildcard origin100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions policy present100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts preload100% evidence confidence
31536000100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts include subdomains100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp present100% evidence confidence
4100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors credentials with wildcard100% evidence confidence

Connection path

Redirect chain

1 recorded hops
Hop 1https://www.gznf.net/

The chain is shown exactly as observed by the scanner. A redirect is not itself a malware finding, but unexpected domains or an HTTP downgrade deserve review.

Premium monitoring

Catch downtime and security changes automatically

Regular checks, availability history, and alert emails are reserved for Premium websites. Free reports remain point-in-time scans and do not create recurring server work.

Enable monitoring for this website

Compared with the previous scan

What changed

A comparison will appear after the next completed scan.

Explainable matching

Digital fingerprint

fingerprint-v1
deep-signal-field-828

Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.

DnsHashed private comparison value
TechnologiesHashed private comparison value

Material changes only

Change history

Show change history

No meaningful changes recorded yet.

Website icon for gznf.net

Visual evidence

Website screenshot

Screenshot of gznf.net
Captured once in an isolated browser during this scan. Visual tint is an interface overlay. The original evidence is not duplicated.

For site owners

Show your verified trust report

Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.

Choose a badge style
Preview on your site
WebsiteVirusScanner trust badge preview

Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.

Questions about gznf.net

FAQ

Still have questions? Contact us →
Is gznf.net safe to visit?

The latest Safety Score is 72/100 with 75% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.

Did the scan detect malware on gznf.net?

ClamAV found no signature match in the sampled homepage HTML. External scripts, downloads and private server files were not checked. This is not a whole-site malware clearance.

When was gznf.net registered?

The public registry record shows Jul 15, 2001. Registration details may be privacy-protected or updated later.

Did gznf.net have a valid TLS certificate?

The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.3. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.

How does gznf.net describe itself?

The website's About page describes its purpose in the report above. This is publisher-supplied information and is separate from independent security findings.

Can a paid listing change this website's score?

No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.

Share your experience with gznf.net

Community reviews are moderated and remain separate from the technical Safety Score.

Write review →