Website reputation report

contentcredentials.org

Last checked 2 days ago · Point-in-time assessment

● Evidence is limited

What is this website?

Public pages were observed on contentcredentials.org, but their subject was not confidently classified. An About page was also found. Recurring page-metadata topics include content credentials, digital, steering committee.

No listed local patterns observedHomepage-only analysis is not a malware clearance. Read the scope and findings below.

72/100Safety Score
75%Evidence Confidence
Trust Radar evidence profile Eight evidence dimensions from zero to one hundred. Exact values surround the chart. Threat Intelligence55 Domain History83 Infrastructure84 Website Security95 Security Hygiene50 Transparency49 Reputation50 Operational Stability96
Trust RadarEight observed factors. Select one to inspect its evidence.

How to read this report

Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.

No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.

Independent evidence brief

What we observed about contentcredentials.org

Updated Sep 30, 2026

The latest scan examined 10 public pages on contentcredentials.org. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.

Purpose and visible content

On its homepage, the site says: Content Credentials provides media transparency with advanced authenticity detection tools.

Registrar and domain history

Registered on Sep 22, 2020. Registrar: 1API GmbH.

Recorded expiry date: Sep 22, 2027. Registry data can change.

Connection and hosting evidence

The checked homepage returned HTTP 200.

A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Nov 5, 2026.

Threat checks and score context

External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.

Safety Score: 72/100. Evidence Confidence: 75%. These measure different things.

Public content profile

Pages reviewed on contentcredentials.org

10 of up to 10 pages

We sampled public pages from this website to understand its subject and contact paths. The titles and short descriptions below come from the website itself. They are not endorsements or independent safety findings.

Content Credentials | Verify Media AuthenticityContent Credentials provides media transparency with advanced authenticity detection tools. C2PA welcomes first advertising holding company to steering committee – Content Credentialshttps://contentcredentials.org/c2pa-welcomes-first-advertising-holding-company-to-steering-committee/ About Content Credentials | Synthetic Media DetectionContent Credentials provides digital transparency through multiple forms of content such as voice cloning, generative ai, and synthetic media. Google to join C2PA to help increase transparency around digital content – Content Credentialshttps://contentcredentials.org/google-to-join-c2pa-to-help-increase-transparency-around-digital-content/ News – Content Credentialshttps://contentcredentials.org/news/ Content Credentials | Media Literacy GlossaryFind out more about digital safety through up-to-date terminology and media related language. Content Credentials | How to Navigate Media SafetyLearn step by step how to use media verification tools to detect distorted images, voice cloning, and other media manipulation to ensure digital safety. The C2PA and Embassy of France Collaborate to Advance Authenticity and Transparency in Digital Content – Content Credentialshttps://contentcredentials.org/the-c2pa-and-embassy-of-france-collaborate-to-advance-authenticity-and-transparency-in-digital-content/ Amazon Joins the C2PA Steering Committee – Content Credentialshttps://contentcredentials.org/amazon-joins-the-c2pa-steering-committee/ Meta Joins the C2PA Steering Committee – Content Credentialshttps://contentcredentials.org/meta-joins-the-c2pa-steering-committee/

Public page evidence

Topics and keywords observed on contentcredentials.org

11 phrases

These phrases were extracted locally from sampled public page metadata. They are observations, not search-volume or ranking estimates.

content credentialsTitle, H1, Meta description10 sampled pages
digitalTitle, H1, Meta description5 sampled pages
steering committeeTitle, H13 sampled pages
mediaTitle, Meta description4 sampled pages
digital contentTitle, H13 sampled pages
transparencyTitle, H1, Meta description4 sampled pages
pa steeringTitle, H12 sampled pages
joinsTitle, H12 sampled pages
authenticityTitle, H1, Meta description2 sampled pages
safetyTitle, Meta description2 sampled pages
detectionTitle, Meta description2 sampled pages

At a glance

Key findings

✓

Report is current

The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.

i

Confidence is separate

Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.

!

Verify before sensitive actions

Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.

Fully explainable

Why this score?

Versioned weights
Threat IntelligenceWeight 25%
55/100

Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.

Domain HistoryWeight 10%
83/100

Domain registration age and expiry were checked.

InfrastructureWeight 10%
84/100

Observed DNS records and network address were checked.

Website SecurityWeight 15%
95/100

Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.

Security HygieneWeight 15%
50/100

Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.

TransparencyWeight 5%
49/100

Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.

ReputationWeight 5%
50/100

Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.

Operational StabilityWeight 15%
96/100

Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.

Server-side analysis

Automated security checks

Local antivirus and phishing checks

ClamAV · homepage HTMLNo signature match in the sampled HTML
Engine version1.5.4
Signature database date (UTC)2026-09-30T06:24:18+00:00
HTML bytes submitted106,085
Phishing.Database · exact hostnameNot listed in this snapshot
Feed downloaded (UTC)2026-09-30T12:00:07+00:00
Hosts in local snapshot386,027

Sampled scripts and pages

Resource analysis incomplete

6 resources checked · 18 script links observed on the homepage. Partial resource coverage.

ClamAV inspects the fetched homepage HTML on our server. New scans also sample up to four linked scripts and two collected internal pages, with size and time limits. Scripts are not executed. Other downloads, private server files and logged-in pages remain outside this check. A signature match needs investigation and can be a false positive. No match is not a whole-site safety guarantee.

Exact hostname lookup uses a downloaded Phishing.Database snapshot. It does not send this domain to an external lookup API or mark sibling subdomains as harmful. Not listed does not mean safe. Snapshot age is download age, not proof that every entry was recently revalidated.

Homepage HTML only · Eight local rule families · local-security-v2

Checks use the fetched page and redirect chain. Scripts are not executed, forms are not submitted, and linked files are not downloaded. This is not a malware clearance.

Page resource inventory

Linked scripts18
Inline scripts9
Embedded frames2
External script hosts0

Counts describe the sampled HTML, not every resource loaded by the browser. External resources are common and are not automatically harmful.

No listed local patterns observed. The limited rule set cannot detect every threat or behavior.

External threat intelligence

Provider coverageNot checked

Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.

Registration

Domain information

Public RDAP observation
Canonical domaincontentcredentials.org
Registrar1API GmbH
RegisteredSep 22, 2020
Domain age6 years
ExpiresSep 22, 2027
Registry statusesclient transfer prohibited
Report statePublished

Infrastructure

Network & hosting

Observed endpoint, not legal location
IP address23.185.0.4
Autonomous systemUnavailable
Network organizationUnavailable
Observed countryUnavailable
CDNNot detected
Web application firewallNot detected

At a glance

Infrastructure summary

Observed during this scan

A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.

HTTP response200 · https://contentcredentials.org/
Endpoint23.185.0.4
NetworkUnavailable
CDN and WAFNot detected · Not detected
DNS surface7 records · 4 nameservers · 0 mail exchangers
Protection signals1 security headers · 5 technologies · DNSSEC unknown

Page telemetry

Observed page statistics

Safe metadata only

These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.

Response size106,085 bytes
HTTP check duration0 ms
Cookies observedUnavailable
Script resources18 · 0 external hosts
Frames and sampled checks2 frames · 6 resources checked

Encrypted transport

TLS certificate

Valid when observed
StatusValid when observed
ProtocolTLSv1.3
IssuercountryName=US, organizationName=Let's Encrypt, commonName=YR2
Valid fromAug 7, 2026
Valid untilNov 5, 2026
Certificate names3mf.io · adversarial-robustness-toolbox.org · aetherproject.org · ai-explainability-360.org · ai-fairness-360.org · anuket.io · bedrockconsortium.org · bitol.io · c2pa.org · cds.lfenergy.org · contentcredentials.org · danosproject.org · datashim.io · dent.dev · dlrover.ai · dronecode.org · elisa.tech · essedum.org · fossology.org · genaicommons.org · genevaers.org · getdab.org · horovod.ai · hpsf.io · isitopen.ai · jointdevelopment.org · jupyter.foundation · jupyterfoundation.org · l3af.io · lfbroadband.org · live-lfprojects5.linuxfoundation.org · networkgradelinux.org · nnstreamer.ai · o-ran-sc.org · ocudu.org · odim.io · onap.org · opea.dev · openapis.org · openchainproject.org · openhpc.community · openidl.org · openmodel.foundation · openstxfoundation.org · p4.org · pqca.org · project-emco.io · project-salus.org · realtime-linux.org · sddiproject.org · stateoftheedge.com · tazama.org · trustmarkinitiative.ai · voiceinteroperability.ai · www.aswf.io · www.automotivelinux.org · www.dpdk.org · www.fossology.org · www.openapis.org · www.tazama.org

Resolution

DNS footprint

DNSKEY status unknown

DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.

A23.185.0.4TTL —
AAAA2620:12a:8000::4TTL —
AAAA2620:12a:8001::4TTL —
NSns1.dnsimple-edge.comTTL —
NSns2.dnsimple-edge.netTTL —
NSns3.dnsimple-edge.ioTTL —
NSns4.dnsimple-edge.orgTTL —

DNS observations · no external lookup API

Domain email protection

Exact-host SPF and DMARC observations help the owner investigate email impersonation risks. They are separate from website malware checks and do not change the Safety Score.

SPFNo matching record returned for this exact hostname
DMARCNo matching record returned for this exact hostname

What to do next

Review the records with your mail administrator. Inventory legitimate senders and test SPF and DKIM alignment before enforcing a stricter DMARC policy. Fix duplicate records and investigate overly permissive SPF rules.

This bounded check does not send email, probe SMTP, evaluate recursive SPF includes, verify DKIM signatures or apply organizational-domain DMARC inheritance. A missing subdomain record does not prove that no inherited protection exists. A DNS timeout is unknown, not an absent record. A policy record is not proof that messages authenticate successfully.

Responsible disclosure

security.txt

RFC 9116 observation

No readable security.txt file was observed at the standard locations. This is informational and is not evidence of malware.

Browser protections

Security headers

1 observed
strict-transport-securitypresent max-age=300; includeSubDomains;

Response headers

Cookie protections

Passive observation

No Set-Cookie header was observed on the sampled homepage response. Other pages may set cookies separately.

Detected stack

Technologies

Bootstrap 80% Google Tag Manager 96% Nginx 93% Tailwind CSS 72% WordPress 95%

Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.

JavaScript library advisories

4 sampled JavaScript files checked locally with Retire.js. Database snapshot: 2026-09-30T02:40:06.930Z.

jquery 3.7.1 No known advisories matched this version in the database snapshot.
jquery-migrate 3.4.1 No known advisories matched this version in the database snapshot.

A version match is not proof that the website is infected or that an issue is exploitable here. Owners should review the advisory, check whether their code is affected and test an update. Up to four external script files are sampled, not every dependency, inline script or dynamically loaded resource.

Recommended maintenance checks

NginxReview the Nginx branch and keep security patches current. Avoid exposing detailed server version headers.
WordPressKeep WordPress core, themes and plugins updated. Remove unused plugins and review administrator accounts.

About this website

What the site says about itself

C2PA welcomes first advertising holding company to steering committee

View the site's About page ↗

This is publisher supplied information. The independent safety findings are shown separately.

Publisher supplied

Public contact details

These details were observed on the website, not independently verified as an active support channel.

Structured facts

Website identity & response

Public page metadata
Page titleContent Credentials | Verify Media Authenticity
First headingAn evolution in understanding online content
DescriptionContent Credentials provides media transparency with advanced authenticity detection tools.
Canonical URLhttps://contentcredentials.org/
Final URLhttps://contentcredentials.org/
HTTP response200 · text/html; charset=UTF-8 · duration unavailable
Languageen-US
Structured typesNone observed
Page page detectedhttps://contentcredentials.org/news/About page detectedhttps://contentcredentials.org/c2pa-welcomes-first-advertising-holding-company-to-steering-committee/Support page detectedhttps://contentcredentials.org/google-to-join-c2pa-to-help-increase-transparency-around-digital-content/
missing100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
en-US100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
7100% evidence confidence
4100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.mail route count100% evidence confidence
unavailable100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.cname present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts preload100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions policy present100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
3100% evidence confidence
300100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors wildcard origin100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors credentials with wildcard100% evidence confidence

Connection path

Redirect chain

0 recorded hops

No redirect hop was recorded for the sampled homepage.

Premium monitoring

Catch downtime and security changes automatically

Regular checks, availability history, and alert emails are reserved for Premium websites. Free reports remain point-in-time scans and do not create recurring server work.

Enable monitoring for this website

Compared with the previous scan

What changed

Safety ScoreNo comparable score
HTTP statusUnavailable → 200
Final URL changedYes
Technologies addedbootstrap, google-tag-manager, nginx, tailwind, wordpress
Technologies removedNone observed

This comparison uses persisted scan evidence only. A changed signal can reflect a real website change, a different response or newly available evidence.

Explainable matching

Digital fingerprint

fingerprint-v1
rapid-shield-wave-562

Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.

DnsHashed private comparison value
TechnologiesHashed private comparison value

Material changes only

Change history

No meaningful changes recorded yet.

Website icon for contentcredentials.org

Visual evidence

Website screenshot

Screenshot of contentcredentials.org
Captured once in an isolated browser during this scan. Visual tint is an interface overlay. The original evidence is not duplicated.

For site owners

Show your verified trust report

Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.

Choose a badge style
Preview on your site
WebsiteVirusScanner trust badge preview

Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.

Questions about contentcredentials.org

FAQ

Still have questions? Contact us →
Is contentcredentials.org safe to visit?

The latest Safety Score is 72/100 with 75% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.

Did the scan detect malware on contentcredentials.org?

ClamAV found no signature match in the sampled homepage HTML. External scripts, downloads and private server files were not checked. This is not a whole-site malware clearance.

When was contentcredentials.org registered?

The public registry record shows Sep 22, 2020. Registration details may be privacy-protected or updated later.

Did contentcredentials.org have a valid TLS certificate?

The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.3. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.

Can a paid listing change this website's score?

No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.