Website reputation report

clien.net

Last checked 3 weeks ago · Point-in-time assessment

73/100Technical Safety ScoreIndependent technical assessment, not a visitor rating
Would you recommend this page? No community votes yet 0/0 Your vote is for this page in this report only—not the entire website. No account required · One vote per browser.
Captured homepage of clien.net in the current scan
Website screenshot from the current report

Share report

● Evidence is limited

What is this website?

Public pages were observed on clien.net, but their subject was not confidently classified.

No listed local patterns observedHomepage-only analysis is not a malware clearance. Read the scope and findings below.

73/100Safety Score
75%Evidence Confidence
Trust Radar evidence profile Eight evidence dimensions from zero to one hundred. Exact values surround the chart. Threat Intelligence55 Domain History95 Infrastructure90 Website Security95 Security Hygiene60 Transparency43 Reputation50 Operational Stability83
Trust RadarEight observed factors. Select one to inspect its evidence.

How to read this report

Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.

No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.

Current report context

What changed since the last scan

  • No earlier report to compare
What this scan could verify · 6 observed, 0 unavailable
DNS observed
Registration lookup observed
Network observed
TLS observed
Website response observed
Website content observed

Unavailable and unperformed checks are not clean results. The detailed evidence below remains the source for each conclusion.

Report an inaccuracy in this report →

Independent evidence brief

What we observed about clien.net

Updated Oct 12, 2026

The latest scan examined 6 public pages on clien.net. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.

Purpose and visible content

On its homepage, the site says: 모두의 커뮤니티 클리앙

Registrar and domain history

Registered on Oct 26, 2001. Registrar: ConnectWave co.,Ltd.

Recorded expiry date: Oct 26, 2030. Registry data can change.

Connection and hosting evidence

The checked homepage returned HTTP 200 in about 4000 ms.

A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Mar 27, 2027.

Threat checks and score context

External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.

Safety Score: 73/100. Evidence Confidence: 75%. These measure different things.

Community reviews of clien.net

No approved reviews yet ☆☆☆☆☆

Visitor experiences are separate from the independent technical Safety Score.

Visitor opinions remain separate from the technical Safety Score.

Public content profile

Pages reviewed on clien.net

6 of up to 10 pages

We sampled public pages from this website to understand its subject and contact paths. The titles and short descriptions below come from the website itself. They are not endorsements or independent safety findings.

Hashtags found on the website: #152543724 · #152543830 · #152544037 · #152543458 · #152544197 · #152545480 · #152546394 . These are site-supplied labels, not search rankings.

클리앙모두의 커뮤니티 클리앙 우크라이나, 얀덱스 데이터센터 잇단 공격…디지털 인프라가 새 표적으로 : 클리앙우크라이나, 얀덱스 데이터센터 잇단 공격…디지털 인프라가 새 표적으로 - AI타임스 우크라이나가 러시아의 데이터·통신 인프라 공격에 대한 대응으로 러시아 IT 대기업 얀덱스의 데이터센터를 잇달아 공격했다. 양국이 상대의 디지털 기반시설을 겨냥하면서 전쟁의 파장이 인터넷·클라우드 서비스와 민간 경제로 번질 수 있다는 우려가 '내 정보 쓰지 말라' 했더니 회원탈퇴…CI 유출 피해자 선택권 논란 : 클리앙"내 정보 쓰지 말라" 했더니 회원탈퇴…CI 유출 피해자 선택권 논란 김선민 의원, CI 처리정지 요구에 사업자별 대응 차이 지적 간편회원은 CI 없이 가입…기존 회원 대체 절차 검토 필요 "유출 피해자 CI 바꿀 수 있어야…CI 갱신요구권도 보장해야" 네이버지도, AI 글래스로 길안내 경험 확장… 실시간 음성 길안내 제공 : 클리앙“50m 앞 왼쪽에 목적지가 있습니다. 근처에 가볼 만한 카페도 추천해드릴까요?” 네이버지도, AI 글래스로 길안내 경험 확장… 실시간 음성 길안내 제공 - 네이버지도, 국내 최초로 구글·삼성의 ‘인텔리전트 아이웨어’, 메타 ‘레이밴 메타’·‘오클리 메타’ 연동 길안내 지원 - AI 글래스 전용 음성 호출 기능 도입… 이 LG유플러스, 통신 데이터로 산악 조난자 수색 범위 좁힌다 : 클리앙LG유플러스 통신 데이터로 산악 조난자 수색 범위 좁힌다 ■ 전북 운장산서 솔빛시스템과 수색 지원 기술 실증…조난자 수색 범위 99% 축소 ■ GPS 기반 측위가 어려운 상황에서도 구조 인력·장비의 효율적 활용 가능성 확인 LG유플러스는 이동통신 기지국 정보와 휴대전화 접속 기록을 활용해 산악 지역 조난자를 수색하는 범위 [단독]…단통법 폐지 후 '성지 낚시질' 74% 폭증 : 클리앙[단독]"갤Z폴드8이 90만원?"…단통법 폐지 후 '성지 낚시질' 74% 폭증

At a glance

Key findings

✓

Report is current

The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.

i

Confidence is separate

Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.

!

Verify before sensitive actions

Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.

Fully explainable

Why this score?

Versioned weights
Threat IntelligenceWeight 25%
55/100

Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.

Domain HistoryWeight 10%
95/100

Domain registration age and expiry were checked.

InfrastructureWeight 10%
90/100

Observed DNS records and network address were checked.

Website SecurityWeight 15%
95/100

Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.

Security HygieneWeight 15%
60/100

Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.

TransparencyWeight 5%
43/100

Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.

ReputationWeight 5%
50/100

Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.

Operational StabilityWeight 15%
83/100

Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.

Server-side analysis

Automated security checks

Local antivirus and phishing checks

ClamAV · homepage HTMLNo signature match in the sampled HTML
Engine version1.5.4
Signature database date (UTC)2026-10-12T06:24:02+00:00
HTML bytes submitted114,821
Phishing.Database · exact hostnameNot listed in this snapshot
Feed downloaded (UTC)2026-10-12T18:00:14+00:00
Hosts in local snapshot386,082

Sampled scripts and pages

Resource analysis incomplete

6 resources checked · 19 script links observed on the homepage. Partial resource coverage.

ClamAV inspects the fetched homepage HTML on our server. New scans also sample up to four linked scripts and two collected internal pages, with size and time limits. Scripts are not executed. Other downloads, private server files and logged-in pages remain outside this check. A signature match needs investigation and can be a false positive. No match is not a whole-site safety guarantee.

Exact hostname lookup uses a downloaded Phishing.Database snapshot. It does not send this domain to an external lookup API or mark sibling subdomains as harmful. Not listed does not mean safe. Snapshot age is download age, not proof that every entry was recently revalidated.

Homepage HTML only · Eight local rule families · local-security-v2

Checks use the fetched page and redirect chain. Scripts are not executed, forms are not submitted, and linked files are not downloaded. This is not a malware clearance.

Page resource inventory

Linked scripts19
Inline scripts6
Embedded frames0
External script hosts4

Counts describe the sampled HTML, not every resource loaded by the browser. External resources are common and are not automatically harmful.

No listed local patterns observed. The limited rule set cannot detect every threat or behavior.

External threat intelligence

Provider coverageNot checked

Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.

Registration

Domain information

Public RDAP observation
Canonical domainclien.net
RegistrarConnectWave co.,Ltd
RegisteredOct 26, 2001
Domain age25 years
ExpiresOct 26, 2030
Registry statusesclient transfer prohibited
Report statePublished

Infrastructure

Network & hosting

Observed endpoint, not legal location
IP address219.251.142.13
Autonomous systemUnavailable
Network organizationUnavailable
Observed countryUnavailable
CDNNot detected
Web application firewallNot detected

At a glance

Infrastructure summary

Observed during this scan

A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.

HTTP response200 · https://www.clien.net/service/
Endpoint219.251.142.13
NetworkUnavailable
CDN and WAFNot detected · Not detected
DNS surface12 records · 4 nameservers · 5 mail exchangers
Protection signals4 security headers · 2 technologies · DNSSEC unknown

Page telemetry

Observed page statistics

Safe metadata only

These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.

Response size114,821 bytes
HTTP check duration4,000 ms
Cookies observed3
Script resources19 · 4 external hosts
Frames and sampled checks0 frames · 6 resources checked

Encrypted transport

TLS certificate

Valid when observed
StatusValid when observed
ProtocolTLSv1.3
IssuercountryName=BE, organizationName=GlobalSign nv-sa, commonName=GlobalSign GCC R6 AlphaSSL CA 2025
Valid fromFeb 23, 2026
Valid untilMar 27, 2027
Certificate names*.clien.net · clien.net

Resolution

DNS footprint

DNSKEY status unknown

DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.

A219.251.142.13TTL —
NSns-1132.awsdns-13.orgTTL —
NSns-1607.awsdns-08.co.ukTTL —
NSns-358.awsdns-44.comTTL —
NSns-704.awsdns-24.netTTL —
MX10 aspmx.l.google.comTTL —
MX20 alt1.aspmx.l.google.comTTL —
MX20 alt2.aspmx.l.google.comTTL —
MX30 aspmx2.googlemail.comTTL —
MX30 aspmx3.googlemail.comTTL —
TXTgoogle-site-verification=HRObEmzX0HKr-BlRedPb5ZRshHNUlr5Mc2whluH2fWoTTL —
TXTv=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:emaildelivery.ap-seoul-1.oci.oraclecloud.com ~allTTL —

DNS observations · no external lookup API

Domain email protection

Exact-host SPF and DMARC observations help the owner investigate email impersonation risks. They are separate from website malware checks and do not change the Safety Score.

SPFPolicy record observed, not fully validated
DMARCMonitoring-only DMARC policy

What to do next

Review the records with your mail administrator. Inventory legitimate senders and test SPF and DKIM alignment before enforcing a stricter DMARC policy. Fix duplicate records and investigate overly permissive SPF rules.

This bounded check does not send email, probe SMTP, evaluate recursive SPF includes, verify DKIM signatures or apply organizational-domain DMARC inheritance. A missing subdomain record does not prove that no inherited protection exists. A DNS timeout is unknown, not an absent record. A policy record is not proof that messages authenticate successfully.

Responsible disclosure

security.txt

RFC 9116 observation

No readable security.txt file was observed at the standard locations. This is informational and is not evidence of malware.

Browser protections

Security headers

4 observed
referrer-policypresent strict-origin-when-cross-origin
strict-transport-securitypresent max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-optionspresent nosniff, nosniff
x-frame-optionspresent SAMEORIGIN, DENY

Response headers

Cookie protections

Passive observation
Cookies observed3
Missing Secure2
Missing HttpOnly2
Missing SameSite2

Only cookie attribute counts are retained. Cookie names and values are never stored. These observations are not proof of compromise and do not independently change the Safety Score.

Detected stack

Technologies

Google Analytics 94% jQuery 3.6.0 82%

Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.

JavaScript library advisories

4 sampled JavaScript files checked locally with Retire.js. Database snapshot: 2026-10-12T02:40:13.167Z.

jquery 1.11.1 5 known advisories. CVE-2015-9251 CVE-2019-11358 CVE-2020-11023

A version match is not proof that the website is infected or that an issue is exploitable here. Owners should review the advisory, check whether their code is affected and test an update. Up to four external script files are sampled, not every dependency, inline script or dynamically loaded resource.

Recommended maintenance checks

jQueryConfirm the observed jQuery version is supported by your application and update it through your normal dependency process.

Publisher supplied

Public contact details

These details were observed on the website, not independently verified as an active support channel.

Emailadmin@clien.netSource: https://www.clien.net/service/

Structured facts

Website identity & response

Public page metadata
Page title클리앙
First headingCLIEN
Description모두의 커뮤니티 클리앙
Canonical URLhttps://www.clien.net/service/
Final URLhttps://www.clien.net/service/
HTTP response200 · text/html;charset=utf-8 · 4000 ms
Languageko
Structured typesOrganization
Page page detectedhttps://www.clien.net/service/board/news
missing100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
ko100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
12100% evidence confidence
4100% evidence confidence
5100% evidence confidence
unavailable100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.cname present100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions policy present100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts preload100% evidence confidence
31536000100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors wildcard origin100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors credentials with wildcard100% evidence confidence
3100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence

Connection path

Redirect chain

2 recorded hops
Hop 1https://clien.net/service/
Hop 2https://www.clien.net/service/

The chain is shown exactly as observed by the scanner. A redirect is not itself a malware finding, but unexpected domains or an HTTP downgrade deserve review.

Premium monitoring

Catch downtime and security changes automatically

Regular checks, availability history, and alert emails are reserved for Premium websites. Free reports remain point-in-time scans and do not create recurring server work.

Enable monitoring for this website

Compared with the previous scan

What changed

A comparison will appear after the next completed scan.

Explainable matching

Digital fingerprint

fingerprint-v1
quiet-harbor-trace-352

Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.

DnsHashed private comparison value
TechnologiesHashed private comparison value

Material changes only

Change history

Show change history

No meaningful changes recorded yet.

Website icon for clien.net

Visual evidence

Website screenshot

Screenshot of clien.net
Captured once in an isolated browser during this scan. Visual tint is an interface overlay. The original evidence is not duplicated.

For site owners

Show your verified trust report

Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.

Choose a badge style
Preview on your site
WebsiteVirusScanner trust badge preview

Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.

Questions about clien.net

FAQ

Still have questions? Contact us →
Is clien.net safe to visit?

The latest Safety Score is 73/100 with 75% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.

Did the scan detect malware on clien.net?

ClamAV found no signature match in the sampled homepage HTML. External scripts, downloads and private server files were not checked. This is not a whole-site malware clearance.

When was clien.net registered?

The public registry record shows Oct 26, 2001. Registration details may be privacy-protected or updated later.

Did clien.net have a valid TLS certificate?

The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.3. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.

Can a paid listing change this website's score?

No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.

Share your experience with clien.net

Community reviews are moderated and remain separate from the technical Safety Score.

Write review →