Trust RadarEight observed factors. Select one to inspect its evidence.
How to read this report
Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.
No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.
Independent evidence brief
What we observed about certificate-transparency.org
Updated Sep 30, 2026
The latest scan examined 0 public pages on certificate-transparency.org. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.
Purpose and visible content
On its homepage, the site says: Certificate Transparency
Topics and keywords observed on certificate-transparency.org
3 phrases
These phrases were extracted locally from sampled public page metadata. They are observations, not search-volume or ranking estimates.
communityTitle, H12 sampled pages
logsTitle, H12 sampled pages
list ofH12 sampled pages
At a glance
Key findings
✓
Report is current
The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.
i
Confidence is separate
Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.
!
Verify before sensitive actions
Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.
Fully explainable
Why this score?
Versioned weights
Threat IntelligenceWeight 25%
55/100
Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.
Domain HistoryWeight 10%
92/100
Domain registration age and expiry were checked.
InfrastructureWeight 10%
91/100
Observed DNS records and network address were checked.
Website SecurityWeight 15%
95/100
Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.
Security HygieneWeight 15%
35/100
Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.
TransparencyWeight 5%
40/100
Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.
ReputationWeight 5%
50/100
Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.
Operational StabilityWeight 15%
96/100
Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.
Server-side analysis
Automated security checks
Local antivirus and phishing checks
ClamAV · homepage HTMLNo signature match in the sampled HTML
Engine version1.5.4
Signature database date (UTC)2026-09-30T06:24:18+00:00
HTML bytes submitted13,488
Phishing.Database · exact hostnameNot listed in this snapshot
Feed downloaded (UTC)2026-09-30T18:00:09+00:00
Hosts in local snapshot386,072
Sampled scripts and pages
Resource analysis incomplete
3 resources checked · 1 script links observed on the homepage. Partial resource coverage.
ClamAV inspects the fetched homepage HTML on our server. New scans also sample up to four linked scripts and two collected internal pages, with size and time limits. Scripts are not executed. Other downloads, private server files and logged-in pages remain outside this check. A signature match needs investigation and can be a false positive. No match is not a whole-site safety guarantee.
Exact hostname lookup uses a downloaded Phishing.Database snapshot. It does not send this domain to an external lookup API or mark sibling subdomains as harmful. Not listed does not mean safe. Snapshot age is download age, not proof that every entry was recently revalidated.
Homepage HTML only · Eight local rule families · local-security-v2
Checks use the fetched page and redirect chain. Scripts are not executed, forms are not submitted, and linked files are not downloaded. This is not a malware clearance.
Page resource inventory
Linked scripts1
Inline scripts0
Embedded frames0
External script hosts0
Counts describe the sampled HTML, not every resource loaded by the browser. External resources are common and are not automatically harmful.
No listed local patterns observed. The limited rule set cannot detect every threat or behavior.
External threat intelligence
Provider coverageNot checked
Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.
A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.
These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.
Response size13,488 bytes
HTTP check duration0 ms
Cookies observedUnavailable
Script resources1 · 0 external hosts
Frames and sampled checks0 frames · 3 resources checked
DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.
A216.239.32.27TTL —
AAAA2001:4860:4802:32::1bTTL —
NSns1.googledomains.comTTL —
NSns2.googledomains.comTTL —
NSns3.googledomains.comTTL —
NSns4.googledomains.comTTL —
CAA0 issue "pki.goog"TTL —
TXTv=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~allTTL —
DNS observations · no external lookup API
Domain email protection
Exact-host SPF and DMARC observations help the owner investigate email impersonation risks. They are separate from website malware checks and do not change the Safety Score.
SPFPolicy record observed, not fully validated
DMARCPolicy record observed, not fully validated
What to do next
Review the records with your mail administrator. Inventory legitimate senders and test SPF and DKIM alignment before enforcing a stricter DMARC policy. Fix duplicate records and investigate overly permissive SPF rules.
This bounded check does not send email, probe SMTP, evaluate recursive SPF includes, verify DKIM signatures or apply organizational-domain DMARC inheritance. A missing subdomain record does not prove that no inherited protection exists. A DNS timeout is unknown, not an absent record. A policy record is not proof that messages authenticate successfully.
Responsible disclosure
security.txt
RFC 9116 observation
No readable security.txt file was observed at the standard locations. This is informational and is not evidence of malware.
Browser protections
Security headers
0 observed
Header evidence is unavailable. Missing data is not treated as a clean result or proof of compromise.
Response headers
Cookie protections
Passive observation
No Set-Cookie header was observed on the sampled homepage response. Other pages may set cookies separately.
Detected stack
Technologies
Bootstrap 80%
Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.
No supported library version was identified in the sampled files. This does not establish that the scripts are safe.
A version match is not proof that the website is infected or that an issue is exploitable here. Owners should review the advisory, check whether their code is affected and test an update. Up to four external script files are sampled, not every dependency, inline script or dynamically loaded resource.
Dns consistency.cname present100% evidence confidence
unavailable100% evidence confidence
Dns consistency.mail route count100% evidence confidence
4100% evidence confidence
8100% evidence confidence
2100% evidence confidence
Local headers.cors credentials with wildcard100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
1100% evidence confidence
Local headers.csp present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.hsts present100% evidence confidence
Local headers.permissions policy present100% evidence confidence
Connection path
Redirect chain
1 recorded hops
Hop 1https://certificate.transparency.dev/
The chain is shown exactly as observed by the scanner. A redirect is not itself a malware finding, but unexpected domains or an HTTP downgrade deserve review.
Premium monitoring
Catch downtime and security changes automatically
Regular checks, availability history, and alert emails are reserved for Premium websites. Free reports remain point-in-time scans and do not create recurring server work.
This comparison uses persisted scan evidence only. A changed signal can reflect a real website change, a different response or newly available evidence.
Explainable matching
Digital fingerprint
fingerprint-v1
⌘
bright-beacon-ring-102
Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.
DnsHashed private comparison value
TechnologiesHashed private comparison value
Explore the same space
Sites related to certificate-transparency.org
Based on published evidence
These independent reports share an observed category or website topic with certificate-transparency.org. A match is a way to explore similar websites, not proof of common ownership or equal safety.
No other published report currently shares a sufficiently confident category or topic. This section updates as the catalog grows.
Material changes only
Change history
No meaningful changes recorded yet.
Visual evidence
Website screenshot
Captured once in an isolated browser during this scan. Visual tint is an interface overlay. The original evidence is not duplicated.
For site owners
Show your verified trust report
Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.
Choose a badge style
Preview on your site
Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.
The latest Safety Score is 70/100 with 75% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.
✳Did the scan detect malware on certificate-transparency.org?⌄
ClamAV found no signature match in the sampled homepage HTML. External scripts, downloads and private server files were not checked. This is not a whole-site malware clearance.
◷When was certificate-transparency.org registered?⌄
The public registry record shows Dec 16, 2011. Registration details may be privacy-protected or updated later.
◇Did certificate-transparency.org have a valid TLS certificate?⌄
The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.3. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.
?Can a paid listing change this website's score?⌄
No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.
Allow Google Analytics and Yandex Metrica to measure visits? Optional analytics stays off until you agree. No session recording.
