What is this website?
Public pages were observed on ar25.org, but their subject was not confidently classified. The sampled pages were marked as Russian-language.
○ Malware status unverifiedNo external threat-provider verdict is available for this scan.
How to read this report
Safety Score evaluates observed signals. Evidence Confidence measures how complete, direct, fresh, and consistent those signals are.
No automated scan can guarantee that a website is safe.
Current report context
What changed since the last scan
- No earlier report to compare
What this scan could verify · 5 observed, 1 unavailable
Unavailable and unperformed checks are not clean results. The detailed evidence below remains the source for each conclusion.
Independent evidence brief
What we observed about ar25.org
The latest scan examined 6 public pages on ar25.org. Website descriptions below come from the site itself. Registration, connection and threat findings were checked separately.
Purpose and visible content
Observed page signals place this website in Other Websites. A fuller description was not available from its public pages during this scan.
- Про нас: мета, напрямки, символіка, гасло, цільова авдиторія, організація,…«Народний Оглядач» – це волонтерський проект глобальної спільноти українців, яка досліджує постіндустріальне суспільство і здійснює ігрове моделювання його…
- Маніфест Palantir: 22 пункти американського націоналізму – Вікно Овертона…Це програмний документ для технологічних правих і націоналістів усього світу. Він реабілітує націоналізм та закликає до відновлення повної…
- Затримано двох колишніх співробітників ФБР у справі Гантера Байдена…23 жовтня Міністерство юстиції США оголосило про затримання двох колишніх співробітників ФБР за підозрою у наданні неправдивих свідчень…
Registrar and domain history
A reliable creation date was not returned by the registration lookup. The report leaves domain age unverified rather than guessing.
Connection and hosting evidence
The checked homepage returned HTTP 200 in about 1000 ms.
A valid TLS certificate was observed, expiring Jan 18, 2027.
Threat checks and score context
External malware-provider coverage was unavailable. The report does not treat this missing check as a clean result.
Safety Score: 63/100. Evidence Confidence: 60%. These measure different things.
Community reviews of ar25.org
No approved reviews yet
Visitor experiences are separate from the independent technical Safety Score.
Visitor opinions remain separate from the technical Safety Score.
Public content profile
Pages reviewed on ar25.org
We sampled public pages from this website to understand its subject and contact paths. The titles and short descriptions below come from the website itself. They are not endorsements or independent safety findings.
Public page evidence
Topics and keywords observed on ar25.org
These phrases were extracted locally from sampled public page metadata. They are observations, not search-volume or ranking estimates.
At a glance
Key findings
Report is current
The displayed evidence comes from the published immutable scan.
Confidence is separate
Unavailable evidence is shown as missing and never counted as clean.
Verify before sensitive actions
Check the exact URL and context before payments, credentials, or downloads.
Fully explainable
Why this score?
Threat providers were unavailable. The neutral uncertainty baseline is not a clean verdict.
Evidence is unavailable.
Observed DNS records and network address were checked.
Observed certificate validity and TLS protocol were checked.
Observed security header values were checked for basic protective settings. Empty values, disabled HSTS and unrecognized values receive no credit. This is not a complete browser-policy validation.
Observed site metadata and About page were checked. Publisher-supplied details are not independently verified.
Popularity is weak context, not proof of safety. Unranked sites use a neutral baseline.
Observed HTTP status and final connection scheme were checked.
Server-side analysis
Automated security checks
Local HTML checks are unavailable for this report. A new scan can collect them if the homepage is accessible.
External threat intelligence
Local checks do not query external reputation databases. An unavailable check is never a clean result.
Registration
Domain information
Infrastructure
Network & hosting
At a glance
Infrastructure summary
A compact view of the connection, DNS and security surface. These observations describe what the scanner could verify at scan time and do not prove ownership or ongoing availability.
Page telemetry
Observed page statistics
These counters describe the fetched response and sampled HTML. Script counts describe references in the markup, not a complete browser network log. Cookie counts cover observed response headers.
Encrypted transport
TLS certificate
Resolution
DNS footprint
DNSKEY presence does not verify the DNSSEC signature chain. Missing records can mean no record was returned or the lookup was unavailable.
104.21.22.225TTL —172.67.207.139TTL —2606:4700:3036::ac43:cf8bTTL —2606:4700:3037::6815:16e1TTL —oaklyn.ns.cloudflare.comTTL —thaddeus.ns.cloudflare.comTTL —10 mail.kryhitka.comTTL —v=spf1 a mx ip4:65.109.115.170 ip4:188.40.65.102 -allTTL —Responsible disclosure
security.txt
No readable security.txt file was observed at the standard locations. This is informational and is not evidence of malware.
Browser protections
Security headers
Response headers
Cookie protections
No Set-Cookie header was observed on the sampled homepage response. Other pages may set cookies separately.
Detected stack
Technologies
Versions are shown only when publicly exposed by the page or response headers. An observed version is not, by itself, proof of a vulnerability.
JavaScript library advisories
JavaScript advisory analysis was not recorded for this scan.
Publisher supplied
Social profiles observed on this website
These links appeared on the website. We have not independently verified ownership of the linked accounts.
YouTube
X
Telegram
Structured facts
Website identity & response
Connection path
Redirect chain
The chain is shown exactly as observed by the scanner. A redirect is not itself a malware finding, but unexpected domains or an HTTP downgrade deserve review.
Compared with the previous scan
What changed
A comparison will appear after the next completed scan.
Explainable matching
Digital fingerprint
Comparable components help find technically related websites. A match does not prove common ownership.
Material changes only
Change history
Show change history
No meaningful changes recorded yet.
Visual evidence
Website screenshot
No usable browser image was saved. The website icon is separate from a screenshot and is not visual evidence of the page.
For site owners
Show your verified trust report
Place this lightweight badge in your footer to show visitors an independent, dated WebsiteVirusScanner report. It can increase visitor confidence, but it never changes or guarantees the score.
Use the current report link so visitors can verify the evidence. A badge is a transparency signal, not a paid ranking boost.
Questions about ar25.org
FAQ
Is ar25.org safe to visit?
The latest Safety Score is 63/100 with 60% Evidence Confidence. This is a point-in-time assessment of observed technical signals, not a guarantee. Check the exact address and avoid entering payment details if anything looks unusual.
Did the scan detect malware on ar25.org?
External threat-provider coverage was unavailable for this scan, so malware status is unverified.
When was ar25.org registered?
The registry lookup did not provide a reliable creation date in this scan.
Did ar25.org have a valid TLS certificate?
The scanner observed a valid TLS certificate using TLSv1.3. A valid certificate alone does not establish that the site is safe.
Can a paid listing change this website's score?
No. Premium placement and owner-supplied pages are labelled separately. Technical evidence, the Safety Score and moderation decisions remain independent.
Share your experience with ar25.org
Community reviews are moderated and remain separate from the technical Safety Score.
Write review →